Car Talk 5: The Juice is Loose!

Brothers of brub and brap, this is your safe space.
User avatar
MrH42
Meat Patty 1st Class
Meat Patty 1st Class
Posts: 769
Joined: Wed Jul 03, 2019 1:13 pm
Drives: '23 Lightning + '23 BRZ

D Griff wrote: Thu Sep 23, 2021 1:23 pm
MrH42 wrote: Thu Sep 23, 2021 1:13 pm Yep. It's a killer deal.

It doesn't have active cruise control, but honestly, those systems really work well in stop and go traffic. If you have a manual, the best use case for it is kind of dead. It's kind of silly to put all the hardware in, and only be able to use it for following the car in front at highway speeds without a lot of speed changes.

It does have blind spot alerts, back up camera, and rear traffic alert. Those are simple, but nice to have things. S2000 has none of that. I'm used to driving top down, but in the rare situation I have the top up, backing up that thing is basically doing it blind. You can't see much of anything.
Yep, top up in 'verts is brutal. GR will obviously have a backup cam in it and has better visibility than any 'vert with the top up.

Do you think you'll miss the 'vert aspect? I do love a nice summer night or fall afternoon top down cruise, but it is kind of a bitch that it essentially disqualifies that car from ever going on track if you're tall.
I got rid of my NC miata and got a BRZ for more practicality. Then added a second daily a few years later. A few more years and I got rid of my 2013 BRZ because I had too much money in what was ultimately my "fun" car. I didn't put many miles on it, and wanted something more exciting, convertible, and cheaper, and landed on the S2000. Now it's appreciated up to the price of a new BRZ almost :derp:

Losing the convertible aspect is my biggest concern. Nothing beats top down driving in nice weather. Realistically though, how many of those days do I get a year now? Summer is unbearably humid for most of it. So it's really April, May, June, and September, October? So 5 months? And you get at least 10 days of rain during those months usually. Then you consider my commute when I do go into the office is stop-and-go on I-75 the whole way. Even on nice days, top down in the S2000 on the highway is awful. Just big rigs jake braking and blasting soot at me. It's so loud it's hard to even listen to a podcast with the top down.

Hell, even the hour trip to see my girlfriend's parents, we never take the S2000. It's really cramped, low, and loud. A new BRZ would get used a lot more.

Just makes more sense to upgrade to something 20 years newer, safer, and more usable if the money is almost a wash.
User avatar
D Griff
Trollistrator
Trollistrator
Posts: 29106
Joined: Thu Nov 03, 2016 8:49 am
Drives: Bicycles/Two Feet

MrH42 wrote: Fri Sep 24, 2021 10:53 am
D Griff wrote: Thu Sep 23, 2021 1:23 pm

Yep, top up in 'verts is brutal. GR will obviously have a backup cam in it and has better visibility than any 'vert with the top up.

Do you think you'll miss the 'vert aspect? I do love a nice summer night or fall afternoon top down cruise, but it is kind of a bitch that it essentially disqualifies that car from ever going on track if you're tall.
I got rid of my NC miata and got a BRZ for more practicality. Then added a second daily a few years later. A few more years and I got rid of my 2013 BRZ because I had too much money in what was ultimately my "fun" car. I didn't put many miles on it, and wanted something more exciting, convertible, and cheaper, and landed on the S2000. Now it's appreciated up to the price of a new BRZ almost :derp:

Losing the convertible aspect is my biggest concern. Nothing beats top down driving in nice weather. Realistically though, how many of those days do I get a year now? Summer is unbearably humid for most of it. So it's really April, May, June, and September, October? So 5 months? And you get at least 10 days of rain during those months usually. Then you consider my commute when I do go into the office is stop-and-go on I-75 the whole way. Even on nice days, top down in the S2000 on the highway is awful. Just big rigs jake braking and blasting soot at me. It's so loud it's hard to even listen to a podcast with the top down.

Hell, even the hour trip to see my girlfriend's parents, we never take the S2000. It's really cramped, low, and loud. A new BRZ would get used a lot more.

Just makes more sense to upgrade to something 20 years newer, safer, and more usable if the money is almost a wash.
:word:

I am definitely with you on the 20 years newer thing... owning an old car is great if you enjoy wrenching and/or have a lot of free time, but I only tolerate wrenching and have other hobbies to spend time on. Even if you're :waxer: and pay a shop to address old car shit, it's time consuming. :dill: with shops is a pain in the ass.

So BRZ/86 are cool, they're basically a 944 but new.
User avatar
troyguitar
Command Chief Master Sirloin
Command Chief Master Sirloin
Posts: 20088
Joined: Wed Nov 02, 2016 11:15 pm
Drives: Trek Domane
Location: Swamp

If the BRZ had a god damn hatch like a 944 I would have found a way to keep mine - or rather, probably bought one in 2013 and still be driving it, looking to order a new one soon.

That tiny trunk opening just isn't acceptable.
User avatar
MrH42
Meat Patty 1st Class
Meat Patty 1st Class
Posts: 769
Joined: Wed Jul 03, 2019 1:13 pm
Drives: '23 Lightning + '23 BRZ

It's a very practical second car. It is not very practical as an only car.

Even on snow tires, I had some trouble with it in winter too. Didn't have enough traction on a lot of surfaces to get moving.
User avatar
ChrisoftheNorth
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 47112
Joined: Thu Nov 03, 2016 6:10 am
Drives: 4R

troyguitar wrote: Fri Sep 24, 2021 12:28 pm If the BRZ had a god damn hatch like a 944 I would have found a way to keep mine - or rather, probably bought one in 2013 and still be driving it, looking to order a new one soon.

That tiny trunk opening just isn't acceptable.
I don't understand why hatches went away. They were all the rage in the 80's and made sports cars practical. I haven't met anyone that claims to NOT want one, so there must be another reason why they're not built anymore. I'm going to guess that it has something to do with rigidity.
Desertbreh wrote: Tue Oct 10, 2017 6:40 pm My guess would be that Chris took some time off because he has read the dialogue on this page 1,345 times and decided to spend some of his free time doing something besides beating a horse to death.
User avatar
D Griff
Trollistrator
Trollistrator
Posts: 29106
Joined: Thu Nov 03, 2016 8:49 am
Drives: Bicycles/Two Feet

Detroit wrote: Fri Sep 24, 2021 12:46 pm
troyguitar wrote: Fri Sep 24, 2021 12:28 pm If the BRZ had a god damn hatch like a 944 I would have found a way to keep mine - or rather, probably bought one in 2013 and still be driving it, looking to order a new one soon.

That tiny trunk opening just isn't acceptable.
I don't understand why hatches went away. They were all the rage in the 80's and made sports cars practical. I haven't met anyone that claims to NOT want one, so there must be another reason why they're not built anymore. I'm going to guess that it has something to do with rigidity.
:dat:

I would guess that it is due to people worshipping stats above all else. Being able to say 'it's 50% stiffer than last model' is probably more important to the manufacturers.

:iono:

I just don't haul shit all that often though. Fuck :pinshit:
User avatar
MrH42
Meat Patty 1st Class
Meat Patty 1st Class
Posts: 769
Joined: Wed Jul 03, 2019 1:13 pm
Drives: '23 Lightning + '23 BRZ

Detroit wrote: Fri Sep 24, 2021 12:46 pm
troyguitar wrote: Fri Sep 24, 2021 12:28 pm If the BRZ had a god damn hatch like a 944 I would have found a way to keep mine - or rather, probably bought one in 2013 and still be driving it, looking to order a new one soon.

That tiny trunk opening just isn't acceptable.
I don't understand why hatches went away. They were all the rage in the 80's and made sports cars practical. I haven't met anyone that claims to NOT want one, so there must be another reason why they're not built anymore. I'm going to guess that it has something to do with rigidity.
Yep, that's exactly it. You got a lot of rigidity by connecting the sides of the body together with the frame that goes around the opening of the back seats going down. A hatch on an 86/BRZ would add a lot of weight and reduce rigidity for a small practicality improvement.
User avatar
troyguitar
Command Chief Master Sirloin
Command Chief Master Sirloin
Posts: 20088
Joined: Wed Nov 02, 2016 11:15 pm
Drives: Trek Domane
Location: Swamp

D Griff wrote:
Detroit wrote: Fri Sep 24, 2021 12:46 pm I don't understand why hatches went away. They were all the rage in the 80's and made sports cars practical. I haven't met anyone that claims to NOT want one, so there must be another reason why they're not built anymore. I'm going to guess that it has something to do with rigidity.
:dat:

I would guess that it is due to people worshipping stats above all else. Being able to say 'it's 50% stiffer than last model' is probably more important to the manufacturers.

:iono:

I just don't haul shit all that often though. Fuck :pinshit:
The only time I drive is to haul shit. Otherwise I walk or bike. Neither a cooler nor a guitar amp fit in the damn tiny trunk openings of the average coupe, you have to awkwardly wedge shit in and out through the doors, which is really fun with cars parked on both sides of you. I've owned 4 of them now and hated it every time... yet I keep considering another one because RWD hatches went away.
User avatar
Desertbreh
Command Chief Master Sirloin
Command Chief Master Sirloin
Posts: 17077
Joined: Thu Nov 03, 2016 11:31 am
Location: Beyond Thunderdome

Oversupply has me at peace with :plac: through AT LEAST the first part of 2021. Took my daughter to UCLA las weekend and moved her in, as an underclassman with no off campus jerb, she won't get a parking pass and wouldn't use her car if she did. I'm not getting rid of her E350, it's too cheap to own. I have a 2019 Tahoe Premier Plus arriving in 10 weeks, the old Tahoe goes south of the border. IF THINGS NORMALIZE, I will then consider replacing the BMW with a 400z or a C8. I will also test drive the forum/s new bukkake machine, the BRZ. I will also take a hard look at the new less flamboyant CTR, and a the Golf R with its soul crushing electronic interior. Until then, :nope: I also agree that you can keep your stiffness, the hatch on the sports car rules extremely hard.
Detroit wrote:Buy 911s instead of diamonds.
Johnny_P wrote: Thu Feb 09, 2023 3:21 pm Earn it and burn it, Val.
max225 wrote: Mon May 01, 2023 5:35 pm Yes it's a cool car. But prepare the lube/sawdust.
User avatar
Desertbreh
Command Chief Master Sirloin
Command Chief Master Sirloin
Posts: 17077
Joined: Thu Nov 03, 2016 11:31 am
Location: Beyond Thunderdome

Desertbreh wrote: Fri Sep 24, 2021 1:52 pm Oversupply has me at peace with :plac: through AT LEAST the first part of 2022. Took my daughter to UCLA las weekend and moved her in, as an underclassman with no off campus jerb, she won't get a parking pass and wouldn't use her car if she did. I'm not getting rid of her E350, it's too cheap to own. I have a 2019 Tahoe Premier Plus arriving in 10 weeks, the old Tahoe goes south of the border. IF THINGS NORMALIZE, I will then consider replacing the BMW with a 400z or a C8. I will also test drive the forum/s new bukkake machine, the BRZ. I will also take a hard look at the new less flamboyant CTR, and a the Golf R with its soul crushing electronic interior. Until then, :nope: I also agree that you can keep your stiffness, the hatch on the sports car rules extremely hard.
Detroit wrote:Buy 911s instead of diamonds.
Johnny_P wrote: Thu Feb 09, 2023 3:21 pm Earn it and burn it, Val.
max225 wrote: Mon May 01, 2023 5:35 pm Yes it's a cool car. But prepare the lube/sawdust.
User avatar
wap
Chief Master Sirloin of the Wasteful Steak
Chief Master Sirloin of the Wasteful Steak
Posts: 45303
Joined: Wed Nov 02, 2016 11:52 pm
Drives: Blue Meanie
Location: Pepperland

troyguitar wrote: Fri Sep 24, 2021 12:28 pm If the BRZ had a god damn hatch like a 944 I would have found a way to keep mine - or rather, probably bought one in 2013 and still be driving it, looking to order a new one soon.

That tiny trunk opening just isn't acceptable.
That would be fantastic, like a new take on an 80's sports coupe.
:wap: Where are these mangos?
Detroit wrote: Fri Apr 16, 2021 1:19 pm I don't understand anything anymore.
User avatar
Desertbreh
Command Chief Master Sirloin
Command Chief Master Sirloin
Posts: 17077
Joined: Thu Nov 03, 2016 11:31 am
Location: Beyond Thunderdome

wap wrote: Fri Sep 24, 2021 1:55 pm
troyguitar wrote: Fri Sep 24, 2021 12:28 pm If the BRZ had a god damn hatch like a 944 I would have found a way to keep mine - or rather, probably bought one in 2013 and still be driving it, looking to order a new one soon.

That tiny trunk opening just isn't acceptable.
That would be fantastic, like a new take on an 80's sports coupe.
What would be fantastic is if Porsche just took the 944 Turbo, put a 400 hp low emissions engine and a 6 speed in it and some giant brakes and sold it new. Don't need to change anything else.*

*This message brought to you by :wap:
Detroit wrote:Buy 911s instead of diamonds.
Johnny_P wrote: Thu Feb 09, 2023 3:21 pm Earn it and burn it, Val.
max225 wrote: Mon May 01, 2023 5:35 pm Yes it's a cool car. But prepare the lube/sawdust.
User avatar
ChrisoftheNorth
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 47112
Joined: Thu Nov 03, 2016 6:10 am
Drives: 4R

Desertbreh wrote: Fri Sep 24, 2021 2:03 pm
wap wrote: Fri Sep 24, 2021 1:55 pm

That would be fantastic, like a new take on an 80's sports coupe.
What would be fantastic is if Porsche just took the 944 Turbo, put a 400 hp low emissions engine and a 6 speed in it and some giant brakes and sold it new. Don't need to change anything else.*

*This message brought to you by :wap:
I wouldn't be surprised if they made an EV similar to this at some point.
Desertbreh wrote: Tue Oct 10, 2017 6:40 pm My guess would be that Chris took some time off because he has read the dialogue on this page 1,345 times and decided to spend some of his free time doing something besides beating a horse to death.
User avatar
ChrisoftheNorth
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 47112
Joined: Thu Nov 03, 2016 6:10 am
Drives: 4R

Desertbreh wrote: Fri Sep 24, 2021 1:52 pm Oversupply has me at peace with :plac: through AT LEAST the first part of 2021. Took my daughter to UCLA las weekend and moved her in, as an underclassman with no off campus jerb, she won't get a parking pass and wouldn't use her car if she did. I'm not getting rid of her E350, it's too cheap to own. I have a 2019 Tahoe Premier Plus arriving in 10 weeks, the old Tahoe goes south of the border. IF THINGS NORMALIZE, I will then consider replacing the BMW with a 400z or a C8. I will also test drive the forum/s new bukkake machine, the BRZ. I will also take a hard look at the new less flamboyant CTR, and a the Golf R with its soul crushing electronic interior. Until then, :nope: I also agree that you can keep your stiffness, the hatch on the sports car rules extremely hard.
:impressive: :waxer:

I've been looking for trucks, have given up for now I think.
Desertbreh wrote: Tue Oct 10, 2017 6:40 pm My guess would be that Chris took some time off because he has read the dialogue on this page 1,345 times and decided to spend some of his free time doing something besides beating a horse to death.
User avatar
MrH42
Meat Patty 1st Class
Meat Patty 1st Class
Posts: 769
Joined: Wed Jul 03, 2019 1:13 pm
Drives: '23 Lightning + '23 BRZ

Desertbreh wrote: Fri Sep 24, 2021 1:52 pm Oversupply has me at peace with :plac: through AT LEAST the first part of 2021. Took my daughter to UCLA las weekend and moved her in, as an underclassman with no off campus jerb, she won't get a parking pass and wouldn't use her car if she did. I'm not getting rid of her E350, it's too cheap to own. I have a 2019 Tahoe Premier Plus arriving in 10 weeks, the old Tahoe goes south of the border. IF THINGS NORMALIZE, I will then consider replacing the BMW with a 400z or a C8. I will also test drive the forum/s new bukkake machine, the BRZ. I will also take a hard look at the new less flamboyant CTR, and a the Golf R with its soul crushing electronic interior. Until then, :nope: I also agree that you can keep your stiffness, the hatch on the sports car rules extremely hard.
:notbad:

Yeah, drive the new bukkake machine. That's the biggset issue I have with a lot of these high power cars. I drive them back to back with a miata or 86, and they are usually less fun. Twice the speed, the half as engaging. The only car I've driven that not only was substantially faster, but also way more fun was a GT3.
User avatar
Desertbreh
Command Chief Master Sirloin
Command Chief Master Sirloin
Posts: 17077
Joined: Thu Nov 03, 2016 11:31 am
Location: Beyond Thunderdome

Detroit wrote: Fri Sep 24, 2021 2:08 pm
Desertbreh wrote: Fri Sep 24, 2021 1:52 pm Oversupply has me at peace with :plac: through AT LEAST the first part of 2021. Took my daughter to UCLA las weekend and moved her in, as an underclassman with no off campus jerb, she won't get a parking pass and wouldn't use her car if she did. I'm not getting rid of her E350, it's too cheap to own. I have a 2019 Tahoe Premier Plus arriving in 10 weeks, the old Tahoe goes south of the border. IF THINGS NORMALIZE, I will then consider replacing the BMW with a 400z or a C8. I will also test drive the forum/s new bukkake machine, the BRZ. I will also take a hard look at the new less flamboyant CTR, and a the Golf R with its soul crushing electronic interior. Until then, :nope: I also agree that you can keep your stiffness, the hatch on the sports car rules extremely hard.
:impressive: :waxer:

I've been looking for trucks, have given up for now I think.
It is my car dealer buddy's current rig, he is replacing it with an X5M. It is everything that's wrong with America in one huge package. 22 inch ramz, 84 charging ports, pretty much every option. It gets me the 6.2 and ten speed without the RST circle jerk ramz though. That engine is actually rated better on the highway than the 5.3 by 1mpg because 10 speed. Also only 1 worse in town.
Detroit wrote:Buy 911s instead of diamonds.
Johnny_P wrote: Thu Feb 09, 2023 3:21 pm Earn it and burn it, Val.
max225 wrote: Mon May 01, 2023 5:35 pm Yes it's a cool car. But prepare the lube/sawdust.
User avatar
troyguitar
Command Chief Master Sirloin
Command Chief Master Sirloin
Posts: 20088
Joined: Wed Nov 02, 2016 11:15 pm
Drives: Trek Domane
Location: Swamp

Meanwhile my thinking at the moment is that, if I had to buy something soon, I would be looking at an 08+ Rabbit/Golf 2.5+6AT or a 2011+ Scion tC 2.5+6AT. Either one in white with cloth interior.
User avatar
ChrisoftheNorth
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 47112
Joined: Thu Nov 03, 2016 6:10 am
Drives: 4R

Desertbreh wrote: Fri Sep 24, 2021 2:27 pm
Detroit wrote: Fri Sep 24, 2021 2:08 pm
:impressive: :waxer:

I've been looking for trucks, have given up for now I think.
It is my car dealer buddy's current rig, he is replacing it with an X5M. It is everything that's wrong with America in one huge package. 22 inch ramz, 84 charging ports, pretty much every option. It gets me the 6.2 and ten speed without the RST circle jerk ramz though. That engine is actually rated better on the highway than the 5.3 by 1mpg because 10 speed. Also only 1 worse in town.
:fancy:

I honestly don't understand the transmission pairing with GM products. More power doesn't need more gears, less power does. 6.2+10 speed is an odd thing to me. I drove a few 6.2 10 speed Silverados back when I worked at GM and they were rather meh. But the power is :nice:

Bring back the powerglide for 450+hp IMO.
Desertbreh wrote: Tue Oct 10, 2017 6:40 pm My guess would be that Chris took some time off because he has read the dialogue on this page 1,345 times and decided to spend some of his free time doing something besides beating a horse to death.
User avatar
ChrisoftheNorth
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 47112
Joined: Thu Nov 03, 2016 6:10 am
Drives: 4R

troyguitar wrote: Fri Sep 24, 2021 2:47 pm Meanwhile my thinking at the moment is that, if I had to buy something soon, I would be looking at an 08+ Rabbit/Golf 2.5+6AT or a 2011+ Scion tC 2.5+6AT. Either one in white with cloth interior.
Man, I really liked my 06 tC. The hatch swallowed so much stuff, it was :mindblown: That was a great car, I always thought the 2nd gens in 2011+ were quite :neat:
Desertbreh wrote: Tue Oct 10, 2017 6:40 pm My guess would be that Chris took some time off because he has read the dialogue on this page 1,345 times and decided to spend some of his free time doing something besides beating a horse to death.
User avatar
Desertbreh
Command Chief Master Sirloin
Command Chief Master Sirloin
Posts: 17077
Joined: Thu Nov 03, 2016 11:31 am
Location: Beyond Thunderdome

Detroit wrote: Fri Sep 24, 2021 3:11 pm
Desertbreh wrote: Fri Sep 24, 2021 2:27 pm

It is my car dealer buddy's current rig, he is replacing it with an X5M. It is everything that's wrong with America in one huge package. 22 inch ramz, 84 charging ports, pretty much every option. It gets me the 6.2 and ten speed without the RST circle jerk ramz though. That engine is actually rated better on the highway than the 5.3 by 1mpg because 10 speed. Also only 1 worse in town.
:fancy:

I honestly don't understand the transmission pairing with GM products. More power doesn't need more gears, less power does. 6.2+10 speed is an odd thing to me. I drove a few 6.2 10 speed Silverados back when I worked at GM and they were rather meh. But the power is :nice:

Bring back the powerglide for 450+hp IMO.
:amazing:
Detroit wrote:Buy 911s instead of diamonds.
Johnny_P wrote: Thu Feb 09, 2023 3:21 pm Earn it and burn it, Val.
max225 wrote: Mon May 01, 2023 5:35 pm Yes it's a cool car. But prepare the lube/sawdust.
User avatar
troyguitar
Command Chief Master Sirloin
Command Chief Master Sirloin
Posts: 20088
Joined: Wed Nov 02, 2016 11:15 pm
Drives: Trek Domane
Location: Swamp

Detroit wrote:
troyguitar wrote: Fri Sep 24, 2021 2:47 pm Meanwhile my thinking at the moment is that, if I had to buy something soon, I would be looking at an 08+ Rabbit/Golf 2.5+6AT or a 2011+ Scion tC 2.5+6AT. Either one in white with cloth interior.
Man, I really liked my 06 tC. The hatch swallowed so much stuff, it was :mindblown: That was a great car, I always thought the 2nd gens in 2011+ were quite :neat:
2nd gen gets a 6 speed and 180 hp, basically the same specs as a Golf 2.5 all around. (or a crosstrek...)

Not great but maybe one could find a non-trashed example for a reasonable price, especially since nobody wants a 2-door.
User avatar
MrH42
Meat Patty 1st Class
Meat Patty 1st Class
Posts: 769
Joined: Wed Jul 03, 2019 1:13 pm
Drives: '23 Lightning + '23 BRZ

Detroit wrote: Fri Sep 24, 2021 3:11 pm
Desertbreh wrote: Fri Sep 24, 2021 2:27 pm

It is my car dealer buddy's current rig, he is replacing it with an X5M. It is everything that's wrong with America in one huge package. 22 inch ramz, 84 charging ports, pretty much every option. It gets me the 6.2 and ten speed without the RST circle jerk ramz though. That engine is actually rated better on the highway than the 5.3 by 1mpg because 10 speed. Also only 1 worse in town.
:fancy:

I honestly don't understand the transmission pairing with GM products. More power doesn't need more gears, less power does. 6.2+10 speed is an odd thing to me. I drove a few 6.2 10 speed Silverados back when I worked at GM and they were rather meh. But the power is :nice:

Bring back the powerglide for 450+hp IMO.
More power allows for more exploitation of gearing to get better mileage.

If the driver is demanding 80% of the power available with the 5.3, it doesn't matter if you have a 10 speed or 6 speed really. It's going to be working in that max power area of the rev range. But that same ask of the 6.2 might only be asking for 60% of available power. With the 10-speed, you've got multiple ways you can deliver that, and can pick the one that delivers the best fuel economy.

Basically, there's more ways to extract fuel economy when you've got more power on tap. So it's worth the investment on the 6.2 to give it a more expensive transmission. You probably see less of a fuel economy bump giving the 5.3 the 10-speed vs giving the 6.2 the 10-speed.
User avatar
Desertbreh
Command Chief Master Sirloin
Command Chief Master Sirloin
Posts: 17077
Joined: Thu Nov 03, 2016 11:31 am
Location: Beyond Thunderdome

MrH42 wrote: Fri Sep 24, 2021 3:34 pm
Detroit wrote: Fri Sep 24, 2021 3:11 pm
:fancy:

I honestly don't understand the transmission pairing with GM products. More power doesn't need more gears, less power does. 6.2+10 speed is an odd thing to me. I drove a few 6.2 10 speed Silverados back when I worked at GM and they were rather meh. But the power is :nice:

Bring back the powerglide for 450+hp IMO.
More power allows for more exploitation of gearing to get better mileage.

If the driver is demanding 80% of the power available with the 5.3, it doesn't matter if you have a 10 speed or 6 speed really. It's going to be working in that max power area of the rev range. But that same ask of the 6.2 might only be asking for 60% of available power. With the 10-speed, you've got multiple ways you can deliver that, and can pick the one that delivers the best fuel economy.

Basically, there's more ways to extract fuel economy when you've got more power on tap. So it's worth the investment on the 6.2 to give it a more expensive transmission. You probably see less of a fuel economy bump giving the 5.3 the 10-speed vs giving the 6.2 the 10-speed.
Everybody gets the 10 speed in the new IRS Tahoes.
Detroit wrote:Buy 911s instead of diamonds.
Johnny_P wrote: Thu Feb 09, 2023 3:21 pm Earn it and burn it, Val.
max225 wrote: Mon May 01, 2023 5:35 pm Yes it's a cool car. But prepare the lube/sawdust.
User avatar
Johnny_P
Chief Master Sirloin of the Wasteful Steak
Chief Master Sirloin of the Wasteful Steak
Posts: 40557
Joined: Thu Nov 03, 2016 9:52 am
Drives: Blue short bus
Location: Philly

Tesla just installed a supercharger next to the refinery I used to work at. Wouldn’t be a big deal to charge up there, it’s only 15 mins from my house.

Too bad I had no clue. Should have bought a model Y.
User avatar
troyguitar
Command Chief Master Sirloin
Command Chief Master Sirloin
Posts: 20088
Joined: Wed Nov 02, 2016 11:15 pm
Drives: Trek Domane
Location: Swamp

They're probably impossible to find, but I wonder how terrible the first gen Mazda6 V6 would be... It came as both a wagon and a hatchback with like 220 hp. IIRC the :manuel: was not geared great, but there was a 6AT that might be better.
Locked