My friend's WRX makes 320whp and has a 6spd swap. It's addicting.Johnny_P wrote: ↑Wed Mar 25, 2020 11:02 amThis is why I haven't done it. There are plenty of shops in a day's drive that would do a great job. The cost gets pretty stupid though. Dyno tune plus an accessport and required mods for more precise fuel control you're looking at about $1500 or more. Then its the slippery slope of why do all that and not go full retard with a downpipe and whatnot.
300 WHP would be awesome in my car though. As is, it makes about 230-250 stock depending on the dyno.
Car Talk 5: The Juice is Loose!
- CaleDeRoo
- Senior Master Sirloin
- Posts: 8101
- Joined: Tue Nov 13, 2018 8:46 pm
- Drives: C5
- Location: CLT NC
- ChrisoftheNorth
- Moderator
- Posts: 47112
- Joined: Thu Nov 03, 2016 6:10 am
- Drives: 4R
Oh...I know all about the slippery slope. I went from doing a clutch in my C5 to heads, cam, gears, tuning, etc, etc, etcJohnny_P wrote: ↑Wed Mar 25, 2020 11:02 amThis is why I haven't done it. There are plenty of shops in a day's drive that would do a great job. The cost gets pretty stupid though. Dyno tune plus an accessport and required mods for more precise fuel control you're looking at about $1500 or more. Then its the slippery slope of why do all that and not go full retard with a downpipe and whatnot.
300 WHP would be awesome in my car though. As is, it makes about 230-250 stock depending on the dyno.
I'd be more concerned about the car's staying power. You've been going back and forth on it for a while. Dont' spend the money if the car's not sticking around for the long haul.
But if it is, I'd absolutely do a few mods before tuning. You only want to pay for tuning once...and yes even small changes can impact the tune.
Desertbreh wrote: ↑Tue Oct 10, 2017 6:40 pm My guess would be that Chris took some time off because he has read the dialogue on this page 1,345 times and decided to spend some of his free time doing something besides beating a horse to death.
- max225
- Chief Master Sirloin of the Wasteful Steak
- Posts: 42856
- Joined: Thu Nov 03, 2016 12:49 am
- Drives: Taco+ Bavarian lemon
Depends on goals hereJohnny_P wrote: ↑Wed Mar 25, 2020 11:02 amThis is why I haven't done it. There are plenty of shops in a day's drive that would do a great job. The cost gets pretty stupid though. Dyno tune plus an accessport and required mods for more precise fuel control you're looking at about $1500 or more. Then its the slippery slope of why do all that and not go full retard with a downpipe and whatnot.
300 WHP would be awesome in my car though. As is, it makes about 230-250 stock depending on the dyno.
- CaleDeRoo
- Senior Master Sirloin
- Posts: 8101
- Joined: Tue Nov 13, 2018 8:46 pm
- Drives: C5
- Location: CLT NC
The sad reality is that even a CAI requires a on those cars. So you either tune on a stock platform or you full :rabithole:Detroit wrote: ↑Wed Mar 25, 2020 11:10 amOh...I know all about the slippery slope. I went from doing a clutch in my C5 to heads, cam, gears, tuning, etc, etc, etcJohnny_P wrote: ↑Wed Mar 25, 2020 11:02 am
This is why I haven't done it. There are plenty of shops in a day's drive that would do a great job. The cost gets pretty stupid though. Dyno tune plus an accessport and required mods for more precise fuel control you're looking at about $1500 or more. Then its the slippery slope of why do all that and not go full retard with a downpipe and whatnot.
300 WHP would be awesome in my car though. As is, it makes about 230-250 stock depending on the dyno.
I'd be more concerned about the car's staying power. You've been going back and forth on it for a while. Dont' spend the money if the car's not sticking around for the long haul.
But if it is, I'd absolutely do a few mods before tuning. You only want to pay for tuning once...and yes even small changes can impact the tune.
- ChrisoftheNorth
- Moderator
- Posts: 47112
- Joined: Thu Nov 03, 2016 6:10 am
- Drives: 4R
I had a tuner tell me that a CAI does more harm than good if a car's not tuned for it. He claimed they redirect air flow in a way so that the MAF doesn't read 100% accurate, so the engine is getting more or less air than it thinks.
He did say that the more direct airflow when tuned for can actually have a nice gain in performance. BUT nobody tunes for CAIs and are probably resulting in best case same performance as stock.
Desertbreh wrote: ↑Tue Oct 10, 2017 6:40 pm My guess would be that Chris took some time off because he has read the dialogue on this page 1,345 times and decided to spend some of his free time doing something besides beating a horse to death.
- troyguitar
- Command Chief Master Sirloin
- Posts: 20088
- Joined: Wed Nov 02, 2016 11:15 pm
- Drives: Trek Domane
- Location: Swamp
It's really different for each combo of engine, intake, tune, and other mods. There's no simple general answer.max225 wrote:What is the actual gain from a CAI, also I find that term misleading as most OEM intakes are actually CAI. But aftermarket conical shit is always WAI
- max225
- Chief Master Sirloin of the Wasteful Steak
- Posts: 42856
- Joined: Thu Nov 03, 2016 12:49 am
- Drives: Taco+ Bavarian lemon
My friends brother cousins friend gained 50whp you're a assholeDetroit wrote: ↑Wed Mar 25, 2020 12:59 pmI had a tuner tell me that a CAI does more harm than good if a car's not tuned for it. He claimed they redirect air flow in a way so that the MAF doesn't read 100% accurate, so the engine is getting more or less air than it thinks.
He did say that the more direct airflow when tuned for can actually have a nice gain in performance. BUT nobody tunes for CAIs and are probably resulting in best case same performance as stock.
- Johnny_P
- Chief Master Sirloin of the Wasteful Steak
- Posts: 40557
- Joined: Thu Nov 03, 2016 9:52 am
- Drives: Blue short bus
- Location: Philly
If you have a turbo car that's sucking in more air you can approach limits of the factory air filter and need a larger filter surface area. It'll become a restriction. Likely little to no benefit for an NA car.Detroit wrote: ↑Wed Mar 25, 2020 12:59 pmI had a tuner tell me that a CAI does more harm than good if a car's not tuned for it. He claimed they redirect air flow in a way so that the MAF doesn't read 100% accurate, so the engine is getting more or less air than it thinks.
He did say that the more direct airflow when tuned for can actually have a nice gain in performance. BUT nobody tunes for CAIs and are probably resulting in best case same performance as stock.
- ChrisoftheNorth
- Moderator
- Posts: 47112
- Joined: Thu Nov 03, 2016 6:10 am
- Drives: 4R
Ah yes, this is a very good point. I have minimal experience with forced induction.Johnny_P wrote: ↑Wed Mar 25, 2020 1:12 pmIf you have a turbo car that's sucking in more air you can approach limits of the factory air filter and need a larger filter surface area. It'll become a restriction. Likely little to no benefit for an NA car.Detroit wrote: ↑Wed Mar 25, 2020 12:59 pm
I had a tuner tell me that a CAI does more harm than good if a car's not tuned for it. He claimed they redirect air flow in a way so that the MAF doesn't read 100% accurate, so the engine is getting more or less air than it thinks.
He did say that the more direct airflow when tuned for can actually have a nice gain in performance. BUT nobody tunes for CAIs and are probably resulting in best case same performance as stock.
Desertbreh wrote: ↑Tue Oct 10, 2017 6:40 pm My guess would be that Chris took some time off because he has read the dialogue on this page 1,345 times and decided to spend some of his free time doing something besides beating a horse to death.
- ChrisoftheNorth
- Moderator
- Posts: 47112
- Joined: Thu Nov 03, 2016 6:10 am
- Drives: 4R
max225 wrote: ↑Wed Mar 25, 2020 1:02 pmMy friends brother cousins friend gained 50whp you're a assholeDetroit wrote: ↑Wed Mar 25, 2020 12:59 pm
I had a tuner tell me that a CAI does more harm than good if a car's not tuned for it. He claimed they redirect air flow in a way so that the MAF doesn't read 100% accurate, so the engine is getting more or less air than it thinks.
He did say that the more direct airflow when tuned for can actually have a nice gain in performance. BUT nobody tunes for CAIs and are probably resulting in best case same performance as stock.
Desertbreh wrote: ↑Tue Oct 10, 2017 6:40 pm My guess would be that Chris took some time off because he has read the dialogue on this page 1,345 times and decided to spend some of his free time doing something besides beating a horse to death.
- Johnny_P
- Chief Master Sirloin of the Wasteful Steak
- Posts: 40557
- Joined: Thu Nov 03, 2016 9:52 am
- Drives: Blue short bus
- Location: Philly
I mean. I loved my AEM long dick cold air intake I had on my (lol) Ford Focus. But I'd be lying if I said it gave me any gains. If anything it lowered HP. But it made such fun loud ass noises I didn't care.
- Johnny_P
- Chief Master Sirloin of the Wasteful Steak
- Posts: 40557
- Joined: Thu Nov 03, 2016 9:52 am
- Drives: Blue short bus
- Location: Philly
It's not sticking around because we can't pave roads in this country and I want an automatic as all my driving sucks anyway.Detroit wrote: ↑Wed Mar 25, 2020 11:10 amOh...I know all about the slippery slope. I went from doing a clutch in my C5 to heads, cam, gears, tuning, etc, etc, etcJohnny_P wrote: ↑Wed Mar 25, 2020 11:02 am
This is why I haven't done it. There are plenty of shops in a day's drive that would do a great job. The cost gets pretty stupid though. Dyno tune plus an accessport and required mods for more precise fuel control you're looking at about $1500 or more. Then its the slippery slope of why do all that and not go full retard with a downpipe and whatnot.
300 WHP would be awesome in my car though. As is, it makes about 230-250 stock depending on the dyno.
I'd be more concerned about the car's staying power. You've been going back and forth on it for a while. Dont' spend the money if the car's not sticking around for the long haul.
But if it is, I'd absolutely do a few mods before tuning. You only want to pay for tuning once...and yes even small changes can impact the tune.
This is more because I have idle time and my brain starts wandering, and this morning wandered to "what would my car be like tuned?" mode.
- ChrisoftheNorth
- Moderator
- Posts: 47112
- Joined: Thu Nov 03, 2016 6:10 am
- Drives: 4R
That's the thing. Be real with what you're buying...mostly a sound maker on NA cars. And that's fine if that's what you want.
The dude that tuned my C5 did claim that on a heads/cam car like mine, the CAI was probably worth almost 10hp after tuning. Less filter restriction, straighter airflow, etc.
Maybe but he claimed to have tuned Heads/cam cars both with and without CAIs and the CAI routinely posted better numbers.
Desertbreh wrote: ↑Tue Oct 10, 2017 6:40 pm My guess would be that Chris took some time off because he has read the dialogue on this page 1,345 times and decided to spend some of his free time doing something besides beating a horse to death.
- max225
- Chief Master Sirloin of the Wasteful Steak
- Posts: 42856
- Joined: Thu Nov 03, 2016 12:49 am
- Drives: Taco+ Bavarian lemon
That's fair...
One of my favorite movie quotes of all time.
- ChrisoftheNorth
- Moderator
- Posts: 47112
- Joined: Thu Nov 03, 2016 6:10 am
- Drives: 4R
Ahhhh yes. Been there.Johnny_P wrote: ↑Wed Mar 25, 2020 1:17 pmIt's not sticking around because we can't pave roads in this country and I want an automatic as all my driving sucks anyway.Detroit wrote: ↑Wed Mar 25, 2020 11:10 am
Oh...I know all about the slippery slope. I went from doing a clutch in my C5 to heads, cam, gears, tuning, etc, etc, etc
I'd be more concerned about the car's staying power. You've been going back and forth on it for a while. Dont' spend the money if the car's not sticking around for the long haul.
But if it is, I'd absolutely do a few mods before tuning. You only want to pay for tuning once...and yes even small changes can impact the tune.
This is more because I have idle time and my brain starts wandering, and this morning wandered to "what would my car be like tuned?" mode.
Lately I've been spending way too much time thinking about buying stuff that I'll never actually buy.
Desertbreh wrote: ↑Tue Oct 10, 2017 6:40 pm My guess would be that Chris took some time off because he has read the dialogue on this page 1,345 times and decided to spend some of his free time doing something besides beating a horse to death.
- Johnny_P
- Chief Master Sirloin of the Wasteful Steak
- Posts: 40557
- Joined: Thu Nov 03, 2016 9:52 am
- Drives: Blue short bus
- Location: Philly
https://youtu.be/Ye_ALPQqYLg?t=414
God, Jason is such a fucking nerd.
BUT, stock vs stage 1 STI. Knocks half a second off 0-60 with a brutal clutch dump. Which I have never done. Actually never "launched" this car over 2k RPM... Anyways. A little more torque in the 3k range should make it feel quite a bit faster.
God, Jason is such a fucking nerd.
BUT, stock vs stage 1 STI. Knocks half a second off 0-60 with a brutal clutch dump. Which I have never done. Actually never "launched" this car over 2k RPM... Anyways. A little more torque in the 3k range should make it feel quite a bit faster.
- Johnny_P
- Chief Master Sirloin of the Wasteful Steak
- Posts: 40557
- Joined: Thu Nov 03, 2016 9:52 am
- Drives: Blue short bus
- Location: Philly
I bought it used for $40Detroit wrote: ↑Wed Mar 25, 2020 1:18 pmThat's the thing. Be real with what you're buying...mostly a sound maker on NA cars. And that's fine if that's what you want.
The dude that tuned my C5 did claim that on a heads/cam car like mine, the CAI was probably worth almost 10hp after tuning. Less filter restriction, straighter airflow, etc.
Maybe but he claimed to have tuned Heads/cam cars both with and without CAIs and the CAI routinely posted better numbers.
- Johnny_P
- Chief Master Sirloin of the Wasteful Steak
- Posts: 40557
- Joined: Thu Nov 03, 2016 9:52 am
- Drives: Blue short bus
- Location: Philly
AlsoJohnny_P wrote: ↑Wed Mar 25, 2020 1:26 pm https://youtu.be/Ye_ALPQqYLg?t=414
God, Jason is such a fucking nerd.
BUT, stock vs stage 1 STI. Knocks half a second off 0-60 with a brutal clutch dump. Which I have never done. Actually never "launched" this car over 2k RPM... Anyways. A little more torque in the 3k range should make it feel quite a bit faster.
This car is like 7-7.5 if you're not being brutal on it (white knuckle race vs a 4 cyl Altima). And 5.5 if you drive it like you hate it. Jesus.
- troyguitar
- Command Chief Master Sirloin
- Posts: 20088
- Joined: Wed Nov 02, 2016 11:15 pm
- Drives: Trek Domane
- Location: Swamp
For reference, with an intake and a custom dyno tune I gained around 25 whp on the - from 355 to 380 at the wheels. The stock intake and tune aren't great on those cars.max225 wrote:My friends brother cousins friend gained 50whp you're a assholeDetroit wrote: ↑Wed Mar 25, 2020 12:59 pm I had a tuner tell me that a CAI does more harm than good if a car's not tuned for it. He claimed they redirect air flow in a way so that the MAF doesn't read 100% accurate, so the engine is getting more or less air than it thinks.
He did say that the more direct airflow when tuned for can actually have a nice gain in performance. BUT nobody tunes for CAIs and are probably resulting in best case same performance as stock.
On my 86 though? I wouldn't expect to see any increase at all, maybe 5 hp. The stock intake and tune are already pretty well optimized.
- max225
- Chief Master Sirloin of the Wasteful Steak
- Posts: 42856
- Joined: Thu Nov 03, 2016 12:49 am
- Drives: Taco+ Bavarian lemon
So many variables here, but overall seemsJohnny_P wrote: ↑Wed Mar 25, 2020 1:26 pm https://youtu.be/Ye_ALPQqYLg?t=414
God, Jason is such a fucking nerd.
BUT, stock vs stage 1 STI. Knocks half a second off 0-60 with a brutal clutch dump. Which I have never done. Actually never "launched" this car over 2k RPM... Anyways. A little more torque in the 3k range should make it feel quite a bit faster.
- max225
- Chief Master Sirloin of the Wasteful Steak
- Posts: 42856
- Joined: Thu Nov 03, 2016 12:49 am
- Drives: Taco+ Bavarian lemon
Well dyno tune that's the driver for the gainzzz isn't it?troyguitar wrote: ↑Wed Mar 25, 2020 1:30 pmFor reference, with an intake and a custom dyno tune I gained around 25 whp on the - from 355 to 380 at the wheels. The stock intake and tune aren't great on those cars.max225 wrote:
My friends brother cousins friend gained 50whp you're a asshole
On my 86 though? I wouldn't expect to see any increase at all, maybe 5 hp. The stock intake and tune are already pretty well optimized.
- Johnny_P
- Chief Master Sirloin of the Wasteful Steak
- Posts: 40557
- Joined: Thu Nov 03, 2016 9:52 am
- Drives: Blue short bus
- Location: Philly
Right. I've gone down this hole before. Last time was black friday timing when a local flatbrim shop had deals on exhausts.Detroit wrote: ↑Wed Mar 25, 2020 1:19 pmAhhhh yes. Been there.Johnny_P wrote: ↑Wed Mar 25, 2020 1:17 pm
It's not sticking around because we can't pave roads in this country and I want an automatic as all my driving sucks anyway.
This is more because I have idle time and my brain starts wandering, and this morning wandered to "what would my car be like tuned?" mode.
Lately I've been spending way too much time thinking about buying stuff that I'll never actually buy.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FZcm08CX3zM
- troyguitar
- Command Chief Master Sirloin
- Posts: 20088
- Joined: Wed Nov 02, 2016 11:15 pm
- Drives: Trek Domane
- Location: Swamp
It's the two combined. Changing the system and then tuning it for that change.max225 wrote:Well dyno tune that's the driver for the gainzzz isn't it?troyguitar wrote: ↑Wed Mar 25, 2020 1:30 pm For reference, with an intake and a custom dyno tune I gained around 25 whp on the - from 355 to 380 at the wheels. The stock intake and tune aren't great on those cars.
On my 86 though? I wouldn't expect to see any increase at all, maybe 5 hp. The stock intake and tune are already pretty well optimized.
Also 25 hp still isn't that much when you're starting out with over 350. In hindsight I wouldn't have bothered.