Page 3 of 319
:plac: finds v2.0: Moar gold on the crangslist
Posted: Mon Jan 28, 2019 10:45 am
by goIftdibrad
dubshow wrote: ↑Mon Jan 28, 2019 10:40 am
Big Brain Bradley wrote: ↑Mon Jan 28, 2019 7:47 am
dang, I'd hit it.
I like my gti but its getting awfully long in the tooth. I'll need to decide soon if I'm riding that
down to zero doll hairs or make a lateral move into some a little newer.
Honestly doe, for a daily the only things that interest me in the ~10k price range is another GTI, a focus st, fiesta st (but its realistically too smol), or a fiat 500 abarth (which is for sure too smol, and i might as well get a
)
the fiat does have a usable back seat
especially for kids.
They are also comically cheap for the 2013 years.
https://www.carmax.com/car/16411122
but dat sypder
ahhh fuck those have had epic depreciation....
Re: :plac: finds v2.0: Moar gold on the crangslist
Posted: Mon Jan 28, 2019 10:46 am
by troyguitar
max225 wrote:
No v8 no better.
The magnum also has 25% more interior volume.
It also isn’t a rav 4.
3 major things that are better about the
Cargo volume with seats down is 72 cu ft in the
and 73 in the Rav. Both have ancient 5-speed slushboxes and do 0-60 in about 6 seconds. Most magnums are trashed by now, way harder to find. It's like 800 lbs heavier too with slow wonky steering and ghetto styling. It basically has a V8, which is not insignificant, but that's it.
:plac: finds v2.0: Moar gold on the crangslist
Posted: Mon Jan 28, 2019 10:46 am
by 4zilch
Big Brain Bradley wrote: ↑Mon Jan 28, 2019 10:45 am
ahhh fuck those have had epic depreciation....
You should buy a FiST.
You won’t.
:plac: finds v2.0: Moar gold on the crangslist
Posted: Mon Jan 28, 2019 10:49 am
by goIftdibrad
4zilch wrote: ↑Mon Jan 28, 2019 10:46 am
Big Brain Bradley wrote: ↑Mon Jan 28, 2019 10:45 am
ahhh fuck those have had epic depreciation....
You should buy a FiST.
You won’t.
:plac: finds v2.0: Moar gold on the crangslist
Posted: Mon Jan 28, 2019 10:54 am
by max225
troyguitar wrote: ↑Mon Jan 28, 2019 10:46 am
max225 wrote:
No v8 no better.
The magnum also has 25% more interior volume.
It also isn’t a rav 4.
3 major things that are better about the
Cargo volume with seats down is 72 cu ft in the
and 73 in the Rav. Both have ancient 5-speed slushboxes and do 0-60 in about 6 seconds. Most magnums are trashed by now, way harder to find. It's like 800 lbs heavier too with slow wonky steering and ghetto styling. It basically has a V8, which is not insignificant, but that's it.
Odd I got interior volume of 133 for the magnum? Can’t just be an extra 25 cu ft in the front. Looks to be around 4170lbs vs 3550-3670. So a bit less in weight diff.
But the magnum is cool, and rare. Whereas the rav4 is just plain ol vanilla. I’d vote magnum for sure
:plac: finds v2.0: Moar gold on the crangslist
Posted: Mon Jan 28, 2019 11:09 am
by dubshow
Big Brain Bradley wrote: ↑Mon Jan 28, 2019 10:45 am
ahhh fuck those have had epic depreciation....
they have stopped at 20k doe. So a 10k hedge and then parked.
:plac: finds v2.0: Moar gold on the crangslist
Posted: Mon Jan 28, 2019 12:27 pm
by max225
:plac: finds v2.0: Moar gold on the crangslist
Posted: Mon Jan 28, 2019 4:08 pm
by wap
Always thought these were super cool, even though I'm not the biggest fan of the interior, which is admittedly fine.
:plac: finds v2.0: Moar gold on the crangslist
Posted: Mon Jan 28, 2019 4:10 pm
by wap
dubshow wrote: ↑Mon Jan 28, 2019 10:40 am
Big Brain Bradley wrote: ↑Mon Jan 28, 2019 7:47 am
dang, I'd hit it.
I like my gti but its getting awfully long in the tooth. I'll need to decide soon if I'm riding that
down to zero doll hairs or make a lateral move into some a little newer.
Honestly doe, for a daily the only things that interest me in the ~10k price range is another GTI, a focus st, fiesta st (but its realistically too smol), or a fiat 500 abarth (which is for sure too smol, and i might as well get a
)
the fiat does have a usable back seat
especially for kids.
They are also comically cheap for the 2013 years.
https://www.carmax.com/car/16411122
but dat sypder
I love these a lot more than I should, and they look really nice in white, IMO.
:plac: finds v2.0: Moar gold on the crangslist
Posted: Mon Jan 28, 2019 9:03 pm
by Melon
:plac: finds v2.0: Moar gold on the crangslist
Posted: Mon Jan 28, 2019 9:35 pm
by wap
:plac: finds v2.0: Moar gold on the crangslist
Posted: Mon Jan 28, 2019 9:45 pm
by dubshow
SLowest thing I've driven to date. In all trims.
:plac: finds v2.0: Moar gold on the crangslist
Posted: Tue Jan 29, 2019 8:09 am
by Melon
dubshow wrote: ↑Mon Jan 28, 2019 9:45 pm
SLowest thing I've driven to date. In all trims.
A friend of mine in highschool had an '88 240, sedan auto. We lined up at a redlight, and my S-10 pulled on him so hard.
This is the same S-10 that trapped the 1/4 in 18.3s @67 mph.
This isn't just slow, this is advance slow.
:plac: finds v2.0: Moar gold on the crangslist
Posted: Tue Jan 29, 2019 8:45 am
by 4zilch
Melon wrote: ↑Tue Jan 29, 2019 8:09 am
dubshow wrote: ↑Mon Jan 28, 2019 9:45 pm
SLowest thing I've driven to date. In all trims.
A friend of mine in highschool had an '88 240, sedan auto. We lined up at a redlight, and my S-10 pulled on him so hard.
This is the same S-10 that trapped the 1/4 in 18.3s @67 mph.
This isn't just slow, this is advance slow.
:plac: finds v2.0: Moar gold on the crangslist
Posted: Tue Jan 29, 2019 8:54 am
by Melon
Re: :plac: finds v2.0: Moar gold on the crangslist
Posted: Wed Jan 30, 2019 2:48 pm
by D Griff
Oh yeah... See if he'll trade you that for the E30? Dat Ferrari ownershit.
:plac: finds v2.0: Moar gold on the crangslist
Posted: Thu Jan 31, 2019 4:29 am
by NeonJonny
:plac: finds v2.0: Moar gold on the crangslist
Posted: Thu Jan 31, 2019 7:52 am
by Johnny_P
GMT400s were beasts. That would make an awesome 4WD battle wagon.
:plac: finds v2.0: Moar gold on the crangslist
Posted: Thu Jan 31, 2019 9:29 am
by ChrisoftheNorth
Johnny_P wrote: ↑Thu Jan 31, 2019 7:52 am
GMT400s were beasts. That would make an awesome 4WD battle wagon.
this thing. It'll go forever.
:plac: finds v2.0: Moar gold on the crangslist
Posted: Thu Jan 31, 2019 10:06 am
by Apex
Johnny_P wrote: ↑Thu Jan 31, 2019 7:52 am
GMT400s were beasts. That would make an awesome 4WD battle wagon.
You could beat the piss out of this thing daily and it would smile and ask for more.
:plac: finds v2.0: Moar gold on the crangslist
Posted: Thu Jan 31, 2019 10:28 am
by ChrisoftheNorth
Apex wrote: ↑Thu Jan 31, 2019 10:06 am
Johnny_P wrote: ↑Thu Jan 31, 2019 7:52 am
GMT400s were beasts. That would make an awesome 4WD battle wagon.
You could beat the piss out of this thing daily and it would smile and ask for more.
My 92 was indestructible. I miss that thing, shouldn't have sold it.
:plac: finds v2.0: Moar gold on the crangslist
Posted: Thu Jan 31, 2019 10:35 am
by max225
Detroit wrote: ↑Thu Jan 31, 2019 10:28 am
Apex wrote: ↑Thu Jan 31, 2019 10:06 am
You could beat the piss out of this thing daily and it would smile and ask for more.
My 92 was indestructible. I miss that thing, shouldn't have sold it.
You have a far better truck
man that 92 was at the worst intersection of being too young to be cool and too old to be nice
:plac: finds v2.0: Moar gold on the crangslist
Posted: Thu Jan 31, 2019 10:40 am
by ChrisoftheNorth
max225 wrote: ↑Thu Jan 31, 2019 10:35 am
Detroit wrote: ↑Thu Jan 31, 2019 10:28 am
My 92 was indestructible. I miss that thing, shouldn't have sold it.
You have a far better truck
man that 92 was at the worst intersection of being too young to be cool and too old to be nice
GMT400's are starting to get cool now. That thing was awesome.
I do prefer the ZR2
:plac: finds v2.0: Moar gold on the crangslist
Posted: Thu Jan 31, 2019 11:36 am
by Johnny_P
Also you guys may have forgotten... old cars suck. Even old trucks need a decent amount of upkeep.
:plac: finds v2.0: Moar gold on the crangslist
Posted: Thu Jan 31, 2019 11:38 am
by max225
Johnny_P wrote: ↑Thu Jan 31, 2019 11:36 am
Also you guys may have forgotten... old cars suck. Even old trucks need a decent amount of upkeep.
everything is better old
