Car Talk 6: Best of times and Worst of Times
Posted: Fri Jun 24, 2022 2:37 pm
On-topic, off-topic, who cares!
https://datforumdoe.com/forum/
You are the insane one bro. Stop worshiping your oxcart transmission and let a single cone and belt do all that pesky work for you.
It was actually only 10% take rate for the CVT.
Desertbreh wrote: ↑Fri Jun 24, 2022 2:45 pmYou are the insane one bro. Stop worshiping your oxcart transmission and let a single cone and belt do all that pesky work for you.
I am kidding of course if I want a CVT I will just go straight to electric.
Desertbreh wrote: ↑Fri Jun 24, 2022 2:45 pmYou are the insane one bro. Stop worshiping your oxcart transmission and let a single cone and belt do all that pesky work for you.
I am kidding of course if I want a CVT I will just go straight to electric.
If I autoX my Cammie, I'd keep the child seats in the back. CVT powered hybrid with the head unit set to fuel economy. I bet it's an easy class to do well in with sticky tars.Gberg2119 wrote: ↑Fri Jun 24, 2022 3:03 pmDesertbreh wrote: ↑Fri Jun 24, 2022 2:45 pm
You are the insane one bro. Stop worshiping your oxcart transmission and let a single cone and belt do all that pesky work for you.
I am kidding of course if I want a CVT I will just go straight to electric.![]()
There was a Civic and an Accord at the autocross this past weekend that were both CVT's. They sounded like they were going to explode out on the course.
I wonder if the adaptive dampers solve the bouncy ride problem or not. If they do and if they can be retrofit to the manual….
Yea,Johnny_P wrote: ↑Sat Jun 25, 2022 8:14 pm
Straight Pipes WRX review.
Ok, flame suit on. I like the looks. Aside from the rear plastic diaper I like it, and I could deal with it looks wise. On all accounts, it sounds like they fixed the 2.0l motor problems of rev hang and wonky power delivery and just ass tuning. So thats excellent. Interior changed and is different and looks totally acceptable in this range, so thats good. The two issues are you don't get any driver aids or any option to add them with the MT, and the fuel mileage at 22 average is just... wow bad.
I'd probably not get it, and I'd still probably go Outback, but is a cool car. I could see myself in one of these, if where I live is conducive to a manual transmission (i.e. not in the Philly area).
I unfollowed those guys, used to watch all their shit. But they got annoying af somehow.Johnny_P wrote: ↑Sat Jun 25, 2022 8:14 pm
Straight Pipes WRX review.
Ok, flame suit on. I like the looks. Aside from the rear plastic diaper I like it, and I could deal with it looks wise. On all accounts, it sounds like they fixed the 2.0l motor problems of rev hang and wonky power delivery and just ass tuning. So thats excellent. Interior changed and is different and looks totally acceptable in this range, so thats good. The two issues are you don't get any driver aids or any option to add them with the MT, and the fuel mileage at 22 average is just... wow bad.
I'd probably not get it, and I'd still probably go Outback, but is a cool car. I could see myself in one of these, if where I live is conducive to a manual transmission (i.e. not in the Philly area).
As did I. At least on instagram every one of their posts was pandering for free shit. Dat influencer lyfe.max225 wrote: ↑Sun Jun 26, 2022 1:31 pmI unfollowed those guys, used to watch all their shit. But they got annoying af somehow.Johnny_P wrote: ↑Sat Jun 25, 2022 8:14 pm
Straight Pipes WRX review.
Ok, flame suit on. I like the looks. Aside from the rear plastic diaper I like it, and I could deal with it looks wise. On all accounts, it sounds like they fixed the 2.0l motor problems of rev hang and wonky power delivery and just ass tuning. So thats excellent. Interior changed and is different and looks totally acceptable in this range, so thats good. The two issues are you don't get any driver aids or any option to add them with the MT, and the fuel mileage at 22 average is just... wow bad.
I'd probably not get it, and I'd still probably go Outback, but is a cool car. I could see myself in one of these, if where I live is conducive to a manual transmission (i.e. not in the Philly area).
I also don’t mind the wrx. Saw the first one in person yesterday. It’s not any better looking than the last gen. But it’s![]()
As a size Note something with 4 cyl should get better mpg than my 450hp m3 got.
They look like a car some kid drew in kindergarten with tires the size of Cheerios
The Subaru awd system is very inefficient, and that engine is also like 6 years old by now.max225 wrote: ↑Sun Jun 26, 2022 1:31 pmI unfollowed those guys, used to watch all their shit. But they got annoying af somehow.Johnny_P wrote: ↑Sat Jun 25, 2022 8:14 pm
Straight Pipes WRX review.
Ok, flame suit on. I like the looks. Aside from the rear plastic diaper I like it, and I could deal with it looks wise. On all accounts, it sounds like they fixed the 2.0l motor problems of rev hang and wonky power delivery and just ass tuning. So thats excellent. Interior changed and is different and looks totally acceptable in this range, so thats good. The two issues are you don't get any driver aids or any option to add them with the MT, and the fuel mileage at 22 average is just... wow bad.
I'd probably not get it, and I'd still probably go Outback, but is a cool car. I could see myself in one of these, if where I live is conducive to a manual transmission (i.e. not in the Philly area).
I also don’t mind the wrx. Saw the first one in person yesterday. It’s not any better looking than the last gen. But it’s![]()
As a size Note something with 4 cyl should get better mpg than my 450hp m3 got.
Which is one of many problems with the car.CaleDeRoo wrote: ↑Mon Jun 27, 2022 12:41 pmThe Subaru awd system is very inefficient, and that engine is also like 6 years old by now.max225 wrote: ↑Sun Jun 26, 2022 1:31 pm
I unfollowed those guys, used to watch all their shit. But they got annoying af somehow.
I also don’t mind the wrx. Saw the first one in person yesterday. It’s not any better looking than the last gen. But it’s![]()
As a size Note something with 4 cyl should get better mpg than my 450hp m3 got.
Yeah the MT cars don’t decouple the rear driveshaft ever. They are always powering it. Where a Haldex type system decouples and saves fuel doing so.CaleDeRoo wrote: ↑Mon Jun 27, 2022 12:41 pmThe Subaru awd system is very inefficient, and that engine is also like 6 years old by now.max225 wrote: ↑Sun Jun 26, 2022 1:31 pm
I unfollowed those guys, used to watch all their shit. But they got annoying af somehow.
I also don’t mind the wrx. Saw the first one in person yesterday. It’s not any better looking than the last gen. But it’s![]()
As a size Note something with 4 cyl should get better mpg than my 450hp m3 got.
Yes. The black flares make the wheels appear larger and more proportionally sized.
Desertbreh wrote: ↑Mon Jun 27, 2022 12:58 pmWhich is one of many problems with the car.
So Subaru does the following:
1. Refuses to make a 350-400 hp of this thing to compete with the ROW.
2. Elminates their top dog STI.
3. Markets this thing as a last bone thrown to the vape crowd. which as noted is a four cylinder car that gets the fuel mileage of a Funny Car.
Face it. Subaru makes lifted sedans and wagons for dog owners, lesbians, and people from the Northwest and other mountain states. They have moved on. You should too.