Soviet EV and taco chronicles + future ponderings about Fendie

Strut your greasy stuff!
User avatar
CaleDeRoo
Senior Master Sirloin
Senior Master Sirloin
Posts: 8108
Joined: Tue Nov 13, 2018 8:46 pm
Drives: C5
Location: CLT NC

max225 wrote: Wed Jan 29, 2020 4:08 pm
CaleDeRoo wrote: Wed Jan 29, 2020 3:05 pm

$23.5k for this. I'll bring it back with me in March.

https://dubai.dubizzle.com/m/motors/use ... obile-list

Or how about a 2020 with 0 farts for $34k

https://dubai.dubizzle.com/m/motors/use ... obile-list
Whoa they made them there in 2017? AND THEY STILL MAKE THEM? :wtf: ?
Yep. They went away over there after 2014 as well but the ME pressured Toyota to bring it back somehow.
User avatar
D Griff
Trollistrator
Trollistrator
Posts: 29150
Joined: Thu Nov 03, 2016 8:49 am
Drives: Bicycles/Two Feet

max225 wrote: Wed Jan 29, 2020 4:08 pm
Desertbreh wrote: Wed Jan 29, 2020 3:20 pm

BMW takeoff is seatbelt, ignition, sport mode switch errday.
Sport+ = base mode in the Mini, the green mode is like the mid mode in the BMW. The throttle mapping in the non M cars is :disgust:
:dat: non sport mode is intolerable. What is annoying as hell is that Sport+ results in ass end out shennanigans being possible but doesn't allow cruise control usage and dials the throttle response to somewhere between Comfort and Sport.
User avatar
max225
Chief Master Sirloin of the Wasteful Steak
Chief Master Sirloin of the Wasteful Steak
Posts: 42896
Joined: Thu Nov 03, 2016 12:49 am
Drives: Taco+ Bavarian lemon

D Griff wrote: Wed Jan 29, 2020 5:03 pm
max225 wrote: Wed Jan 29, 2020 4:08 pm

Sport+ = base mode in the Mini, the green mode is like the mid mode in the BMW. The throttle mapping in the non M cars is :disgust:
:dat: non sport mode is intolerable. What is annoying as hell is that Sport+ results in ass end out shennanigans being possible but doesn't allow cruise control usage and dials the throttle response to somewhere between Comfort and Sport.
Weird I had no issues with CC. Must be a :manuel: thing. My settings in the Fake sports were "sport" throttle + normal trans+sport suspension. + stiffest wheel. My fav setting in the M3 was certainly the "sport, not sport plus" throttle, "lowest trans" and "medium" steering wheel. The amount of customization is just frigging annoying to be honest. Just set the car up right so we don't have to :bruh:
User avatar
D Griff
Trollistrator
Trollistrator
Posts: 29150
Joined: Thu Nov 03, 2016 8:49 am
Drives: Bicycles/Two Feet

max225 wrote: Wed Jan 29, 2020 5:07 pm
D Griff wrote: Wed Jan 29, 2020 5:03 pm

:dat: non sport mode is intolerable. What is annoying as hell is that Sport+ results in ass end out shennanigans being possible but doesn't allow cruise control usage and dials the throttle response to somewhere between Comfort and Sport.
Weird I had no issues with CC. Must be a :manuel: thing. My settings in the Fake sports were "sport" throttle + normal trans+sport suspension. + stiffest wheel. My fav setting in the M3 was certainly the "sport, not sport plus" throttle, "lowest trans" and "medium" steering wheel. The amount of customization is just frigging annoying to be honest. Just set the car up right so we don't have to :bruh:
Mine has none of that... only thing that really changes is throttle response and level of TCS.
User avatar
max225
Chief Master Sirloin of the Wasteful Steak
Chief Master Sirloin of the Wasteful Steak
Posts: 42896
Joined: Thu Nov 03, 2016 12:49 am
Drives: Taco+ Bavarian lemon

D Griff wrote: Wed Jan 29, 2020 5:22 pm
max225 wrote: Wed Jan 29, 2020 5:07 pm

Weird I had no issues with CC. Must be a :manuel: thing. My settings in the Fake sports were "sport" throttle + normal trans+sport suspension. + stiffest wheel. My fav setting in the M3 was certainly the "sport, not sport plus" throttle, "lowest trans" and "medium" steering wheel. The amount of customization is just frigging annoying to be honest. Just set the car up right so we don't have to :bruh:
Mine has none of that... only thing that really changes is throttle response and level of TCS.
Hmm I don't believe my fake sport had "dynamic" traction control. The m3 did... the fake sport and the mini have a TC off which puts it into a pseudo sport mode for DSC, and then DSC full off. Those are the two settings.

Mini certainly has 3 throttle maps
Sport which is epic
Regular which is great
Green which works great for commuting

I don't have adjustable suspension so same same

And then regular wheel/sport which is SUPER STIFF but feels good too.

On top of that trans has 3 modes as well... regular/sport is manually selectable and green lets the car freewheel on the freeway.
User avatar
max225
Chief Master Sirloin of the Wasteful Steak
Chief Master Sirloin of the Wasteful Steak
Posts: 42896
Joined: Thu Nov 03, 2016 12:49 am
Drives: Taco+ Bavarian lemon

Um... so
33k FJ sold
26k FJ sold
18.7k FJ sold with blown clutch
User avatar
MexicanYarisTK
Senior Master Sirloin
Senior Master Sirloin
Posts: 10110
Joined: Tue Nov 08, 2016 9:14 am
Drives: An Okinowa Cruiseship
Location: 6 miles north of Sleepy Joes House & 5 miles from Bosphorus Channel

max225 wrote: Sun Feb 02, 2020 4:14 pm Um... so
33k FJ sold
26k FJ sold
18.7k FJ sold with blown clutch
poor next owner with the last one
Nephew of a :plac: a few first gen immigrant on DFD, resident turk, and ex nazi egg lover now driving a middle class mom mobile.
User avatar
Tar
Chief Master Sirloin
Chief Master Sirloin
Posts: 14145
Joined: Fri Nov 04, 2016 6:06 pm
Drives: Beige Family Sedan sans Dent
Location: Canuckistan

Like you said,there are lots of tech dudes making 200k/yr in your area, many of them like cars too.
User avatar
max225
Chief Master Sirloin of the Wasteful Steak
Chief Master Sirloin of the Wasteful Steak
Posts: 42896
Joined: Thu Nov 03, 2016 12:49 am
Drives: Taco+ Bavarian lemon

Tarspin wrote: Sun Feb 02, 2020 6:34 pm Like you said,there are lots of tech dudes making 200k/yr in your area, many of them like cars too.
Yep. Market is strong on these. It also goes to show that there is a major gap in the automotive landscape.

Simple nice riding off-road vehicles are just not for sale outside of the wrangler new. It props the used prices into the stratosphere.
User avatar
Tar
Chief Master Sirloin
Chief Master Sirloin
Posts: 14145
Joined: Fri Nov 04, 2016 6:06 pm
Drives: Beige Family Sedan sans Dent
Location: Canuckistan

max225 wrote: Mon Feb 03, 2020 8:13 am
Tarspin wrote: Sun Feb 02, 2020 6:34 pm Like you said,there are lots of tech dudes making 200k/yr in your area, many of them like cars too.
Yep. Market is strong on these. It also goes to show that there is a major gap in the automotive landscape.

Simple nice riding off-road vehicles are just not for sale outside of the wrangler new. It props the used prices into the stratosphere.
Most of the nice riding stuff looks very soccer mom which also adds to the challenge since none of that is really unique looking. If you do find an FJ you like you're going to have to buy it on the spot from the sound of things. I'm sure more will pop up, the good thing is that you know the market better now that you've seen all three candidates sell quickly.
User avatar
D Griff
Trollistrator
Trollistrator
Posts: 29150
Joined: Thu Nov 03, 2016 8:49 am
Drives: Bicycles/Two Feet

Gotta pay to play man.

It is kind of insane that one fetched $33k though.

I’d have just bought the clutch one and swapped in a new one, $24k car for $20k and some sweat hours.
User avatar
max225
Chief Master Sirloin of the Wasteful Steak
Chief Master Sirloin of the Wasteful Steak
Posts: 42896
Joined: Thu Nov 03, 2016 12:49 am
Drives: Taco+ Bavarian lemon

D Griff wrote: Mon Feb 03, 2020 9:34 am Gotta pay to play man.

It is kind of insane that one fetched $33k though.

I’d have just bought the clutch one and swapped in a new one, $24k car for $20k and some sweat hours.
Yea .... but I just didn’t know enough back then... my options at that point in time were 26k for a 2012 with 72k miles or 18.6k plus 2 k clutch for a 2007. The 12 seemed like a better deal.
User avatar
max225
Chief Master Sirloin of the Wasteful Steak
Chief Master Sirloin of the Wasteful Steak
Posts: 42896
Joined: Thu Nov 03, 2016 12:49 am
Drives: Taco+ Bavarian lemon

Tarspin wrote: Mon Feb 03, 2020 9:04 am
max225 wrote: Mon Feb 03, 2020 8:13 am

Yep. Market is strong on these. It also goes to show that there is a major gap in the automotive landscape.

Simple nice riding off-road vehicles are just not for sale outside of the wrangler new. It props the used prices into the stratosphere.
Most of the nice riding stuff looks very soccer mom which also adds to the challenge since none of that is really unique looking. If you do find an FJ you like you're going to have to buy it on the spot from the sound of things. I'm sure more will pop up, the good thing is that you know the market better now that you've seen all three candidates sell quickly.
:dat: seems to be the case. I still have to weigh it against a new wrangler it seems. It’s sort of insane that they are priced similarly
User avatar
Tar
Chief Master Sirloin
Chief Master Sirloin
Posts: 14145
Joined: Fri Nov 04, 2016 6:06 pm
Drives: Beige Family Sedan sans Dent
Location: Canuckistan

max225 wrote: Mon Feb 03, 2020 10:27 am
Tarspin wrote: Mon Feb 03, 2020 9:04 am

Most of the nice riding stuff looks very soccer mom which also adds to the challenge since none of that is really unique looking. If you do find an FJ you like you're going to have to buy it on the spot from the sound of things. I'm sure more will pop up, the good thing is that you know the market better now that you've seen all three candidates sell quickly.
:dat: seems to be the case. I still have to weigh it against a new wrangler it seems. It’s sort of insane that they are priced similarly
I like the 2012 version better then the 2007 version you dug up, but for the money I like your Ocean Blue Wrangler idea the best. They don't ride as nice and depreciation is a bitch, but it probably will be on the 2012 you found too. It's a tough call bro.
User avatar
razr390
Command Chief Master Sirloin
Command Chief Master Sirloin
Posts: 19644
Joined: Thu Nov 03, 2016 12:08 am
Drives: MK7.5 on 87

Dacia Sandero
:doughnut: :narc: :doughnut:
Desertbreh wrote: Thu Oct 17, 2019 3:05 pm DFD. The forum where everybody makes the same choices and then tells anybody trying to join the club that they are the stupidest motherfucker to ever walk the earth.
User avatar
max225
Chief Master Sirloin of the Wasteful Steak
Chief Master Sirloin of the Wasteful Steak
Posts: 42896
Joined: Thu Nov 03, 2016 12:49 am
Drives: Taco+ Bavarian lemon

Tarspin wrote: Mon Feb 03, 2020 11:26 am
max225 wrote: Mon Feb 03, 2020 10:27 am
:dat: seems to be the case. I still have to weigh it against a new wrangler it seems. It’s sort of insane that they are priced similarly
I like the 2012 version better then the 2007 version you dug up, but for the money I like your Ocean Blue Wrangler idea the best. They don't ride as nice and depreciation is a bitch, but it probably will be on the 2012 you found too. It's a tough call bro.
It really is a tough call.
The MSRP of a :wrangler: that I like is around 42k. After decent negotiating you can get that down to 32-34k. A low mile FJ is actually MORE expensive than that... sub 40k miles =35k+ for something 6 years old or older. I think that's def out of my budget...

I don't mind something older unless it feels beat to shit... and 150k+ mile FJs are all beat to shit based on my drives.
There are 3 categories of FJs.
2007-09 models - Rear end issues, fender issues (haven't seen any). 12-20k depending on miles 60k>200k. Directly correlated with price.
2010+ with 60-130k miles, ~20-30k
2013+ :unicorn: 's with sub 50k miles that people seem to want 35-50k

I think I'd like to stick with a 2010+ model as it comes with no known issues... :oops: as the 07s are too old, and 13+ are way too expensive as they cost more than a new JLU
User avatar
Tar
Chief Master Sirloin
Chief Master Sirloin
Posts: 14145
Joined: Fri Nov 04, 2016 6:06 pm
Drives: Beige Family Sedan sans Dent
Location: Canuckistan

max225 wrote: Mon Feb 03, 2020 1:48 pm
Tarspin wrote: Mon Feb 03, 2020 11:26 am

I like the 2012 version better then the 2007 version you dug up, but for the money I like your Ocean Blue Wrangler idea the best. They don't ride as nice and depreciation is a bitch, but it probably will be on the 2012 you found too. It's a tough call bro.
It really is a tough call.
The MSRP of a :wrangler: that I like is around 42k. After decent negotiating you can get that down to 32-34k. A low mile FJ is actually MORE expensive than that... sub 40k miles =35k+ for something 6 years old or older. I think that's def out of my budget...

I don't mind something older unless it feels beat to shit... and 150k+ mile FJs are all beat to shit based on my drives.
There are 3 categories of FJs.
2007-09 models - Rear end issues, fender issues (haven't seen any). 12-20k depending on miles 60k>200k. Directly correlated with price.
2010+ with 60-130k miles, ~20-30k
2013+ :unicorn: 's with sub 50k miles that people seem to want 35-50k

I think I'd like to stick with a 2010+ model as it comes with no known issues... :oops: as the 07s are too old, and 13+ are way too expensive as they cost more than a new JLU
I'd buy in that range too, I think they will always hold more value then the 07+ because they have no known issues. Essentially, they are a collectible until there's no practical way to service them IMO
User avatar
max225
Chief Master Sirloin of the Wasteful Steak
Chief Master Sirloin of the Wasteful Steak
Posts: 42896
Joined: Thu Nov 03, 2016 12:49 am
Drives: Taco+ Bavarian lemon

Tarspin wrote: Mon Feb 03, 2020 4:05 pm
max225 wrote: Mon Feb 03, 2020 1:48 pm

It really is a tough call.
The MSRP of a :wrangler: that I like is around 42k. After decent negotiating you can get that down to 32-34k. A low mile FJ is actually MORE expensive than that... sub 40k miles =35k+ for something 6 years old or older. I think that's def out of my budget...

I don't mind something older unless it feels beat to shit... and 150k+ mile FJs are all beat to shit based on my drives.
There are 3 categories of FJs.
2007-09 models - Rear end issues, fender issues (haven't seen any). 12-20k depending on miles 60k>200k. Directly correlated with price.
2010+ with 60-130k miles, ~20-30k
2013+ :unicorn: 's with sub 50k miles that people seem to want 35-50k

I think I'd like to stick with a 2010+ model as it comes with no known issues... :oops: as the 07s are too old, and 13+ are way too expensive as they cost more than a new JLU
I'd buy in that range too, I think they will always hold more value then the 07+ because they have no known issues. Essentially, they are a collectible until there's no practical way to service them IMO
The potential "upcharge" for a 10+ model seems neglible, once you figure in the fact that they are 3>6 years younger with 40-80k less miles... Finding a clean one is key. Which isn't super easy... the search continues.
User avatar
max225
Chief Master Sirloin of the Wasteful Steak
Chief Master Sirloin of the Wasteful Steak
Posts: 42896
Joined: Thu Nov 03, 2016 12:49 am
Drives: Taco+ Bavarian lemon

User avatar
Desertbreh
Command Chief Master Sirloin
Command Chief Master Sirloin
Posts: 17085
Joined: Thu Nov 03, 2016 11:31 am
Location: Beyond Thunderdome

max225 wrote: Mon Feb 03, 2020 4:55 pm https://www.fjcruiserforums.com/threads ... 00.739601/

This is actually a good :dill: at 49k :wtf:
There you go.
Detroit wrote:Buy 911s instead of diamonds.
Johnny_P wrote: Thu Feb 09, 2023 3:21 pm Earn it and burn it, Val.
max225 wrote: Mon May 01, 2023 5:35 pm Yes it's a cool car. But prepare the lube/sawdust.
User avatar
Johnny_P
Chief Master Sirloin of the Wasteful Steak
Chief Master Sirloin of the Wasteful Steak
Posts: 40563
Joined: Thu Nov 03, 2016 9:52 am
Drives: Blue short bus
Location: Philly

max225 wrote: Mon Feb 03, 2020 4:55 pm https://www.fjcruiserforums.com/threads ... 00.739601/

This is actually a good :dill: at 49k :wtf:
Could have 5 RR Sports for that much.
User avatar
max225
Chief Master Sirloin of the Wasteful Steak
Chief Master Sirloin of the Wasteful Steak
Posts: 42896
Joined: Thu Nov 03, 2016 12:49 am
Drives: Taco+ Bavarian lemon

https://www.cargurus.com/Cars/inventory ... =261859341

This is an actually good deal here. I should go check it out...
User avatar
D Griff
Trollistrator
Trollistrator
Posts: 29150
Joined: Thu Nov 03, 2016 8:49 am
Drives: Bicycles/Two Feet

max225 wrote: Mon Feb 03, 2020 1:48 pm
Tarspin wrote: Mon Feb 03, 2020 11:26 am

I like the 2012 version better then the 2007 version you dug up, but for the money I like your Ocean Blue Wrangler idea the best. They don't ride as nice and depreciation is a bitch, but it probably will be on the 2012 you found too. It's a tough call bro.
It really is a tough call.
The MSRP of a :wrangler: that I like is around 42k. After decent negotiating you can get that down to 32-34k. A low mile FJ is actually MORE expensive than that... sub 40k miles =35k+ for something 6 years old or older. I think that's def out of my budget...

I don't mind something older unless it feels beat to shit... and 150k+ mile FJs are all beat to shit based on my drives.
There are 3 categories of FJs.
2007-09 models - Rear end issues, fender issues (haven't seen any). 12-20k depending on miles 60k>200k. Directly correlated with price.
2010+ with 60-130k miles, ~20-30k
2013+ :unicorn: 's with sub 50k miles that people seem to want 35-50k

I think I'd like to stick with a 2010+ model as it comes with no known issues... :oops: as the 07s are too old, and 13+ are way too expensive as they cost more than a new JLU
Sadly very few people take care of their vehicles well at all. Most >50K mile cars are there are already beat to shit somehow. It's :disgust:
User avatar
max225
Chief Master Sirloin of the Wasteful Steak
Chief Master Sirloin of the Wasteful Steak
Posts: 42896
Joined: Thu Nov 03, 2016 12:49 am
Drives: Taco+ Bavarian lemon

D Griff wrote: Mon Feb 03, 2020 6:47 pm
max225 wrote: Mon Feb 03, 2020 1:48 pm

It really is a tough call.
The MSRP of a :wrangler: that I like is around 42k. After decent negotiating you can get that down to 32-34k. A low mile FJ is actually MORE expensive than that... sub 40k miles =35k+ for something 6 years old or older. I think that's def out of my budget...

I don't mind something older unless it feels beat to shit... and 150k+ mile FJs are all beat to shit based on my drives.
There are 3 categories of FJs.
2007-09 models - Rear end issues, fender issues (haven't seen any). 12-20k depending on miles 60k>200k. Directly correlated with price.
2010+ with 60-130k miles, ~20-30k
2013+ :unicorn: 's with sub 50k miles that people seem to want 35-50k

I think I'd like to stick with a 2010+ model as it comes with no known issues... :oops: as the 07s are too old, and 13+ are way too expensive as they cost more than a new JLU
Sadly very few people take care of their vehicles well at all. Most >50K mile cars are there are already beat to shit somehow. It's :disgust:
Seats worn out
Weird smells inside vehicle
stained headliners
Scratched to shit seat backs/trunks
Faded headlights
Worn out steering wheels, leather peeling or peeled
Torn seats
All pre 2010 with 100k + had that

Like our 410k mile crown vic has none of that. And it's not like it wasn't driven...
User avatar
D Griff
Trollistrator
Trollistrator
Posts: 29150
Joined: Thu Nov 03, 2016 8:49 am
Drives: Bicycles/Two Feet

max225 wrote: Mon Feb 03, 2020 6:55 pm
D Griff wrote: Mon Feb 03, 2020 6:47 pm

Sadly very few people take care of their vehicles well at all. Most >50K mile cars are there are already beat to shit somehow. It's :disgust:
Seats worn out
Weird smells inside vehicle
stained headliners
Scratched to shit seat backs/trunks
Faded headlights
Worn out steering wheels, leather peeling or peeled
Torn seats
All pre 2010 with 100k + had that

Like our 410k mile crown vic has none of that. And it's not like it wasn't driven...
:dat: I am far from Zillspec and wash my cars 10X per year and really don't go over the top with care but somehow my 17 year old 'vette is still pretty :nice:

People just really don't give a fuck and are lazy. Most homes are :disgust: as well. I just can't stand to live in filth.
Post Reply