Desertbreh wrote: ↑Thu Jul 07, 2022 7:54 pmYou don't mar your visor with your old ass man garage door opener and instead you command your home from a fully integrated technological solution.

Desertbreh wrote: ↑Thu Jul 07, 2022 7:54 pmYou don't mar your visor with your old ass man garage door opener and instead you command your home from a fully integrated technological solution.
I conceded the point above but Mr. Allen DID NOT.wap wrote: ↑Thu Jul 07, 2022 7:59 pmDesertbreh wrote: ↑Thu Jul 07, 2022 7:54 pm
You don't mar your visor with your old ass man garage door opener and instead you command your home from a fully integrated technological solution.![]()
Destroyed? lol.Detroit wrote: ↑Thu Jul 07, 2022 7:55 pmYou don't have that stupid thing hanging from the visor destroying it, plus you never have to change batteries. Our house didn't come with an opener, so I bought the cheapest compatible one just to program homelink in the vehicles. I leave the opener for the house sitter, that's all it gets used for.
wap wrote: ↑Thu Jul 07, 2022 8:01 pmDestroyed? lol.Detroit wrote: ↑Thu Jul 07, 2022 7:55 pm
You don't have that stupid thing hanging from the visor destroying it, plus you never have to change batteries. Our house didn't come with an opener, so I bought the cheapest compatible one just to program homelink in the vehicles. I leave the opener for the house sitter, that's all it gets used for.
I've changed my battery once in 16 years.
The angst is real.Desertbreh wrote: ↑Thu Jul 07, 2022 7:57 pm To be fair the homelink in the MBZ does not work and I have not filed a disability claim from the stress caused by my visor clip opener nor its effect upon the visor.
doublewap wrote: ↑Thu Jul 07, 2022 8:01 pmDestroyed? lol.Detroit wrote: ↑Thu Jul 07, 2022 7:55 pm
You don't have that stupid thing hanging from the visor destroying it, plus you never have to change batteries. Our house didn't come with an opener, so I bought the cheapest compatible one just to program homelink in the vehicles. I leave the opener for the house sitter, that's all it gets used for.
I've changed my battery once in 16 years.
Seriously. Got a new opener when the garage was built in 2006. Replaced battery once several years ago. It'll probably need to be replaced again in the next year or so.
Absolutely. They can leave a permanent mark if there long enough. Had it happen in my e30, it sucked.wap wrote: ↑Thu Jul 07, 2022 8:01 pmDestroyed? lol.Detroit wrote: ↑Thu Jul 07, 2022 7:55 pm
You don't have that stupid thing hanging from the visor destroying it, plus you never have to change batteries. Our house didn't come with an opener, so I bought the cheapest compatible one just to program homelink in the vehicles. I leave the opener for the house sitter, that's all it gets used for.
I've changed my battery once in 16 years.
Holy shit. Just when I think we hit rock bottom, I'm always proven wrong. WowJohnny_P wrote: ↑Thu Jul 07, 2022 8:10 pm https://www.caranddriver.com/news/a4054 ... -chargers/
Trumpers are the worst. Like, who tf cares if a business offers free EV charging? Is this any different than offering free dog treats, or a lollipop at a bank, or literally any other promotional expense that a company decides to incur?
Also, "they have to offer free gas" is fucking retarded. So, is gas going to be offered at the same "charge rate" as EVs? Spend an hour here and you get 1/4 gallon? Who elects these idiots?
It's not "trumpers" its POOR people.Johnny_P wrote: ↑Thu Jul 07, 2022 8:11 pm https://www.caranddriver.com/news/a4054 ... -chargers/
Trumpers are the worst. Like, who tf cares if a business offers free EV charging? Is this any different than offering free dog treats, or a lollipop at a bank, or free wifi, or a free coffee, or literally any other promotional expense that a company decides to incur?
Also, "they have to offer free gas" is fucking retarded. So, is gas going to be offered at the same "charge rate" as EVs? Spend an hour here and you get 1/4 gallon? Who elects these idiots?
Johnny_P wrote: ↑Thu Jul 07, 2022 8:11 pm https://www.caranddriver.com/news/a4054 ... -chargers/
Trumpers are the worst. Like, who tf cares if a business offers free EV charging? Is this any different than offering free dog treats, or a lollipop at a bank, or free wifi, or a free coffee, or literally any other promotional expense that a company decides to incur?
Also, "they have to offer free gas" is fucking retarded. So, is gas going to be offered at the same "charge rate" as EVs? Spend an hour here and you get 1/4 gallon? Who elects these idiots?
BrilliantJohnny_P wrote: ↑Thu Jul 07, 2022 8:10 pm https://www.caranddriver.com/news/a4054 ... -chargers/
Trumpers are the worst. Like, who tf cares if a business offers free EV charging? Is this any different than offering free dog treats, or a lollipop at a bank, or literally any other promotional expense that a company decides to incur?
Also, "they have to offer free gas" is fucking retarded. So, is gas going to be offered at the same "charge rate" as EVs? Spend an hour here and you get 1/4 gallon? Who elects these idiots?
Well, I don't want poors in my restaurant. I want Marshal Zhukov and the Baezn and their big dick Tesla and their fancy wine order and hopefully they are big tipping motherfuckers. The poors can go to Wal Mart and get a 20 pack of bean and cheese burritos.max225 wrote: ↑Thu Jul 07, 2022 8:23 pmIt's not "trumpers" its POOR people.Johnny_P wrote: ↑Thu Jul 07, 2022 8:11 pm https://www.caranddriver.com/news/a4054 ... -chargers/
Trumpers are the worst. Like, who tf cares if a business offers free EV charging? Is this any different than offering free dog treats, or a lollipop at a bank, or free wifi, or a free coffee, or literally any other promotional expense that a company decides to incur?
Also, "they have to offer free gas" is fucking retarded. So, is gas going to be offered at the same "charge rate" as EVs? Spend an hour here and you get 1/4 gallon? Who elects these idiots?
Is it really fair to subsidize EVs to this level and FUCK THE POOR to this level ? No one can afford a $55k tesla. So I see their point.
Fun fact Electrify america is funded by the diesel GAYte lawsuit...
But all that said ev charging is shitty AF all over and shouldn't be removed. Also EVs are not the future to "carbon neutrality". When the power that fuel them comes from coal/nat gas and lithium takes mountains to move...
Ron,
Yep that’s the wayolifeDesertbreh wrote: ↑Thu Jul 07, 2022 8:31 pmWell, I don't want poors in my restaurant. I want Marshal Zhukov and the Baezn and their big dick Tesla and their fancy wine order and hopefully they are big tipping motherfuckers. The poors can go to Wal Mart and get a 20 pack of bean and cheese burritos.max225 wrote: ↑Thu Jul 07, 2022 8:23 pm
It's not "trumpers" its POOR people.
Is it really fair to subsidize EVs to this level and FUCK THE POOR to this level ? No one can afford a $55k tesla. So I see their point.
Fun fact Electrify america is funded by the diesel GAYte lawsuit...
But all that said ev charging is shitty AF all over and shouldn't be removed. Also EVs are not the future to "carbon neutrality". When the power that fuel them comes from coal/nat gas and lithium takes mountains to move...
Desertbreh wrote: ↑Thu Jul 07, 2022 8:33 pmRon,with your 7 year VW batteries, 16 year garage door batteries, lifetime plastic water pumps, and window visors made of titanium. Shit that happens to the rest of us doesn't happen to Ron Broham and his cavalcade of extra durable durable goods.
I can see their point when you put it that way, but damn...the .gov has decided EV is the future full stop, and we gotta start somewhere with charging infrastructure. Rip the chargers out and what do you do when the fed mandates EVs but there's nowhere to charge them because you resisted for so long? It's just insane and more evidence of why the .gov needs to stop trying to influence the supply side of the equation.max225 wrote: ↑Thu Jul 07, 2022 8:23 pmIt's not "trumpers" its POOR people.Johnny_P wrote: ↑Thu Jul 07, 2022 8:11 pm https://www.caranddriver.com/news/a4054 ... -chargers/
Trumpers are the worst. Like, who tf cares if a business offers free EV charging? Is this any different than offering free dog treats, or a lollipop at a bank, or free wifi, or a free coffee, or literally any other promotional expense that a company decides to incur?
Also, "they have to offer free gas" is fucking retarded. So, is gas going to be offered at the same "charge rate" as EVs? Spend an hour here and you get 1/4 gallon? Who elects these idiots?
Is it really fair to subsidize EVs to this level and FUCK THE POOR to this level ? No one can afford a $55k tesla. So I see their point.
Fun fact Electrify america is funded by the diesel GAYte lawsuit...
But all that said ev charging is shitty AF all over and shouldn't be removed. Also EVs are not the future to "carbon neutrality". When the power that fuel them comes from coal/nat gas and lithium takes mountains to move...
PA is majority nuclear power. Can't speak for the rest of the country tho. They're more of a future to lowered emissions than a miniature gas-burning 40% efficient rolling power plant is. Especially as the source of electricity shifts away from coal and fossil fuels. Your Tesla being case in point, which is powered by your solar panels so essentially zero emissions after it was built.max225 wrote: ↑Thu Jul 07, 2022 8:23 pmIt's not "trumpers" its POOR people.Johnny_P wrote: ↑Thu Jul 07, 2022 8:11 pm https://www.caranddriver.com/news/a4054 ... -chargers/
Trumpers are the worst. Like, who tf cares if a business offers free EV charging? Is this any different than offering free dog treats, or a lollipop at a bank, or free wifi, or a free coffee, or literally any other promotional expense that a company decides to incur?
Also, "they have to offer free gas" is fucking retarded. So, is gas going to be offered at the same "charge rate" as EVs? Spend an hour here and you get 1/4 gallon? Who elects these idiots?
Is it really fair to subsidize EVs to this level and FUCK THE POOR to this level ? No one can afford a $55k tesla. So I see their point.
Fun fact Electrify america is funded by the diesel GAYte lawsuit...
But all that said ev charging is shitty AF all over and shouldn't be removed. Also EVs are not the future to "carbon neutrality". When the power that fuel them comes from coal/nat gas and lithium takes mountains to move...