max225 wrote: ↑Mon May 25, 2020 12:28 am
In case anyone wonders ... the Conti esc tires are about 2mpg Worse than the stock run craps. Went from 26-8 to 24-26.
max225 wrote: ↑Mon May 25, 2020 12:28 am
In case anyone wonders ... the Conti esc tires are about 2mpg Worse than the stock run craps. Went from 26-8 to 24-26.
max225 wrote: ↑Mon May 25, 2020 12:28 am
In case anyone wonders ... the Conti esc tires are about 2mpg Worse than the stock run craps. Went from 26-8 to 24-26.
Are you driving harder and not noticing?
drove 200 miles yesterday mostly freeway. Couldn’t crack 30 on the freeway, before I was able to average around 30-32 freeway, now it’s at 28-9
Last edited by max225 on Mon May 25, 2020 10:11 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Apex wrote: ↑Tue May 26, 2020 6:56 pm
My last tank in the Rado was 23.4.
I don't know what my truck gets, the dash has never read above 18 ever, so what's the point in wasting braincells to calculate?
My ZR2 was pretty bad too. Aero is a bitch.
Desertbreh wrote: ↑Tue Oct 10, 2017 6:40 pm
My guess would be that Chris took some time off because he has read the dialogue on this page 1,345 times and decided to spend some of his free time doing something besides beating a horse to death.
I don't know what my truck gets, the dash has never read above 18 ever, so what's the point in wasting braincells to calculate?
My ZR2 was pretty bad too. Aero is a bitch.
Hard to imagine a JT having better aero than a zr2.
Lift, cut open fascia, both get about the same MPG
Desertbreh wrote: ↑Tue Oct 10, 2017 6:40 pm
My guess would be that Chris took some time off because he has read the dialogue on this page 1,345 times and decided to spend some of his free time doing something besides beating a horse to death.
Dang. According to the computer in the I was averaging 25.9 at 60 MPG, ended up at 23.7 with about half at 60 and half at 78 plus maybe 15% in towns. Curious to see the actual results, will probably fill up today. Dat 4 cylinder lyfe.
D Griff wrote: ↑Sat May 30, 2020 4:02 pm
Dang. According to the computer in the I was averaging 25.9 at 60 MPG, ended up at 23.7 with about half at 60 and half at 78 plus maybe 15% in towns. Curious to see the actual results, will probably fill up today. Dat 4 cylinder lyfe.
After more than 6k miles, we are still over 23mpg with the mud terrains.
D Griff wrote: ↑Sat May 30, 2020 4:02 pm
Dang. According to the computer in the I was averaging 25.9 at 60 MPG, ended up at 23.7 with about half at 60 and half at 78 plus maybe 15% in towns. Curious to see the actual results, will probably fill up today. Dat 4 cylinder lyfe.
Curious about actual mpgay. Same as my mini with the same size engine
D Griff wrote: ↑Sat May 30, 2020 4:02 pm
Dang. According to the computer in the I was averaging 25.9 at 60 MPG, ended up at 23.7 with about half at 60 and half at 78 plus maybe 15% in towns. Curious to see the actual results, will probably fill up today. Dat 4 cylinder lyfe.
Curious about actual mpgay. Same as my mini with the same size engine
D Griff wrote: ↑Sat May 30, 2020 4:02 pm
Dang. According to the computer in the I was averaging 25.9 at 60 MPG, ended up at 23.7 with about half at 60 and half at 78 plus maybe 15% in towns. Curious to see the actual results, will probably fill up today. Dat 4 cylinder lyfe.
After more than 6k miles, we are still over 23mpg with the mud terrains.
You guys have more miles on your JL than my wife has on hers, and she's had it twice as long.
Hers is the hybrid, but it's getting the same 23MPG indicated. The hybrid is nice because the start/stop system is undetectable, and the extra torque boost is
Desertbreh wrote: ↑Tue Oct 10, 2017 6:40 pm
My guess would be that Chris took some time off because he has read the dialogue on this page 1,345 times and decided to spend some of his free time doing something besides beating a horse to death.
After more than 6k miles, we are still over 23mpg with the mud terrains.
You guys have more miles on your JL than my wife has on hers, and she's had it twice as long.
Hers is the hybrid, but it's getting the same 23MPG indicated. The hybrid is nice because the start/stop system is undetectable, and the extra torque boost is
We don’t like to sit around...
Not getting nearly as many miles these days, but it’s such a sweet
Detroit wrote: ↑Mon Jun 01, 2020 12:15 pm
You guys have more miles on your JL than my wife has on hers, and she's had it twice as long.
Hers is the hybrid, but it's getting the same 23MPG indicated. The hybrid is nice because the start/stop system is undetectable, and the extra torque boost is
We don’t like to sit around...
Not getting nearly as many miles these days, but it’s such a sweet
It really is.
I drive by all the time just put a Bikini Willys out front. Thought of you, that thing looks so awesome.
Desertbreh wrote: ↑Tue Oct 10, 2017 6:40 pm
My guess would be that Chris took some time off because he has read the dialogue on this page 1,345 times and decided to spend some of his free time doing something besides beating a horse to death.
D Griff wrote: ↑Sat May 30, 2020 4:02 pm
Dang. According to the computer in the I was averaging 25.9 at 60 MPG, ended up at 23.7 with about half at 60 and half at 78 plus maybe 15% in towns. Curious to see the actual results, will probably fill up today. Dat 4 cylinder lyfe.
Curious about actual mpgay. Same as my mini with the same size engine
The first tank resulted in 19.8 MPG real world calculation. The MPGee counter and mileage weren't reset at the same time so I'm on the disparity between the two. This tank included a 210 mile highway/back road road trip, a bunch of around town and a bit of off roading on the sand.
After more than 6k miles, we are still over 23mpg with the mud terrains.
Hot damn. That’s a yuge improvement.
I averaged 16 in the JKU.
Both JLU's I had (a V6 and a turbo 4) averaged somewhere near 23-24 MPG. Lots of highway driving, some town type speeds. They were on minivan tires though.