Jeeponomics 101: Eternal tirekicking for the leakless Jeep
Posted: Tue Feb 05, 2019 12:17 pm
For you? Totalled. Twice.
On-topic, off-topic, who cares!
https://datforumdoe.com/forum/
For you? Totalled. Twice.
o it was totaled when she bought it?[user not found] wrote: ↑Tue Feb 05, 2019 12:19 pmHer cars are write-offs - 75% of the mileage she does is work-related.
All the big trips are done in my cars.
I'm fine with a regular car. The wife's mazderp has 6 or so inches of clearance and runs 16" and it's fine, but I don't have any interest in driving anything lower than that in the North. There is an acceptable middle ground between and[user not found] wrote: ↑Tue Feb 05, 2019 12:10 pm And this is why I've largely given up on driving a "car" in this area. We have potholes the size of motorcycles opening up with the current freeze-thaw cycles going on. I get shit on for it, but the life is great in a or a
The wife called me today to just tell me that she hit a chunk of pavement that was kicked up from the vehicle in front of her.
Yeah, the C5 scrapes on every damn thing here and is very annoying to DD because of it. The BMW scraps on nothing ever and can be driven totally NFG but is still entertaining-ish to drive compared to a Tacoma or something.troyguitar wrote: ↑Tue Feb 05, 2019 12:28 pmI'm fine with a regular car. The wife's mazderp has 6 or so inches of clearance and runs 16" and it's fine, but I don't have any interest in driving anything lower than that in the North. There is an acceptable middle ground between and[user not found] wrote: ↑Tue Feb 05, 2019 12:10 pm And this is why I've largely given up on driving a "car" in this area. We have potholes the size of motorcycles opening up with the current freeze-thaw cycles going on. I get shit on for it, but the life is great in a or a
The wife called me today to just tell me that she hit a chunk of pavement that was kicked up from the vehicle in front of her.
I think that the base Stinger on 17s for example would be a great compromise. Still a decent handling RWD-based sporty thing but with some clearance and a big hatch to haul crap, plus 30 mpg instead of 20 on the highway.
I know a LOT of people that DGAF about cars that have damaged wheels and have sworn off "low profile tires". They're now in CUVs.Detroit wrote: ↑Tue Feb 05, 2019 12:07 pmI dunno, we've driven all over the region and it's bad everywhere. It's going to become a major issue as all states claim to be too poor to fix it. I'm not even sure what all my state income tax, car reg, and property tax go to anymore. I really think it's a big contributing factor to crossover adoption.
We're paying an extra 30-40 cents a gallon for "better roads" as of Nov 2017... VOTED TO KEEEP TAXES HIGH because COMMUNIST CALIFORNIAJohnny_P wrote: ↑Tue Feb 05, 2019 1:54 pmI know a LOT of people that DGAF about cars that have damaged wheels and have sworn off "low profile tires". They're now in CUVs.Detroit wrote: ↑Tue Feb 05, 2019 12:07 pm
I dunno, we've driven all over the region and it's bad everywhere. It's going to become a major issue as all states claim to be too poor to fix it. I'm not even sure what all my state income tax, car reg, and property tax go to anymore. I really think it's a big contributing factor to crossover adoption.
50/17 is a pretty good middle ground. The whole "must go full caged racecar or full with no compromises allowed" mentality is[user not found] wrote: ↑Tue Feb 05, 2019 12:35 pmEveryone has their preferences. I just have no interest in a sedan with balloon tires.troyguitar wrote: ↑Tue Feb 05, 2019 12:28 pm
I'm fine with a regular car. The wife's mazderp has 6 or so inches of clearance and runs 16" and it's fine, but I don't have any interest in driving anything lower than that in the North. There is an acceptable middle ground between and
I think that the base Stinger on 17s for example would be a great compromise. Still a decent handling RWD-based sporty thing but with some clearance and a big hatch to haul crap, plus 30 mpg instead of 20 on the highway.
troyguitar wrote: ↑Tue Feb 05, 2019 2:22 pm50/17 is a pretty good middle ground. The whole "must go full caged racecar or full with no compromises allowed" mentality is[user not found] wrote: ↑Tue Feb 05, 2019 12:35 pm
Everyone has their preferences. I just have no interest in a sedan with balloon tires.
There are in fact shades of in between an F1 car and a Baja truck.
205/65r15 on the Volt has been pretty great.troyguitar wrote: ↑Tue Feb 05, 2019 2:22 pm50/17 is a pretty good middle ground. The whole "must go full caged racecar or full with no compromises allowed" mentality is[user not found] wrote: ↑Tue Feb 05, 2019 12:35 pm
Everyone has their preferences. I just have no interest in a sedan with balloon tires.
There are in fact shades of in between an F1 car and a Baja truck.
I'm paying more than you are. PA has the highest gas tax in the country. And how many times have you run into a road deformation so violent that it feels like someone took a sledgehammer and hit your dashboard with it? That's a regular occurrence if you're on PA highways. My car resists it better than the GTI's mushy dampers ever did, but it still happens.
A Turbro crosstrek or 2.0T Alltrack would be 5/7.[user not found] wrote: ↑Tue Feb 05, 2019 3:59 pmI actually would legit love an Alltrack with the GTI's 2.0T.troyguitar wrote: ↑Tue Feb 05, 2019 2:22 pm
50/17 is a pretty good middle ground. The whole "must go full caged racecar or full with no compromises allowed" mentality is
There are in fact shades of in between an F1 car and a Baja truck.
But it doesn't exist. CX5 Turbo is the closest thing.
[user not found] wrote: ↑Tue Feb 05, 2019 4:18 pm
Anyways, back to chat.
Just took in a 2016 Rubicon 2dr with everything.
And muh is done.
?[user not found] wrote: ↑Tue Feb 05, 2019 4:18 pm
Anyways, back to chat.
Just took in a 2016 Rubicon 2dr with everything.
And muh is done.
I am assuming he means someone traded in a and his was waterproofed at the two separate events... but I could beD Griff wrote: ↑Tue Feb 05, 2019 4:35 pm?[user not found] wrote: ↑Tue Feb 05, 2019 4:18 pm
Anyways, back to chat.
Just took in a 2016 Rubicon 2dr with everything.
And muh is done.
switcharoo?
Deets on the ruby?[user not found] wrote: ↑Tue Feb 05, 2019 4:18 pm
Anyways, back to chat.
Just took in a 2016 Rubicon 2dr with everything.
And muh is done.
[user not found] wrote: ↑Tue Feb 05, 2019 3:59 pmI actually would legit love an Alltrack with the GTI's 2.0T.troyguitar wrote: ↑Tue Feb 05, 2019 2:22 pm
50/17 is a pretty good middle ground. The whole "must go full caged racecar or full with no compromises allowed" mentality is
There are in fact shades of in between an F1 car and a Baja truck.
But it doesn't exist. CX5 Turbo is the closest thing.
[user not found] wrote: ↑Tue Feb 05, 2019 6:03 pmOlive green with 32k and crank everything. Soft top.
Seems fairly clean. Has Bedtred liners inside.
How much did you guys give him for it?[user not found] wrote: ↑Tue Feb 05, 2019 6:03 pmOlive green with 32k and crank everything. Soft top.
Seems fairly clean. Has Bedtred liners inside.
SAWCE wrote: ↑Tue Feb 05, 2019 7:26 pmHow much did you guys give him for it?[user not found] wrote: ↑Tue Feb 05, 2019 6:03 pm
Olive green with 32k and crank everything. Soft top.
Seems fairly clean. Has Bedtred liners inside.