KYGTIGuy wrote: ↑Wed Sep 26, 2018 3:46 pm
dubshow wrote: ↑Wed Sep 26, 2018 3:41 pm
The FBI, where they go in for some rape and come out with tax evasion charges.
There isn't much in the way of going back into the 80s and looking into covering someones mouth and pre-raping them, not actually raping because someone allegedly stopped them. There is literally zero evidence other than accusations.
Maybe they can find the Polaroids he took?
I can't say I'd approve of a Tax evader on the SC either honestly. And she passed a polygraph
This didn't happen to Gorsuch so I don't buy that it's all a scam hit job.
Just pick someone clean
Polygraphs are grossly inaccurate and are not admissible as evidence in court.
Also, why the fuck are people acting as if this guy’s personal life has not been examined under the microscope to begin with? He is a FEDERAL JUDGE. The background processes to get THAT far are pretty intense, let alone another one done for SCOTUS.
You still haven’t answered why you think the Democrats waited months to put these allegations forth?
Should I claim sexual harassment next time a female flashes in public during Mardi Gras?
I am not saying the accuser is guilty or innocent, and even more so whether Kavanuagh is. But you are obviously acting/reacting out of emotion.
Kavanaugh testified first because she wanted him to. How can someone testify to defend themselves if they don’t know what allegation, under oath, they are accused of?