DFD

As of tonight the US, UK, and France have launched one of the largest strikes in history. Against the Syrian chemical weapons production, research, and storage capability.

Official numbers on the amount of munitions utilized, what kind, and any losses to coalition partners have not become available to the public.

This was a major response to the continued use of internationally banned chem weapons. As we move forward the US is fully prepared to engage if the Syrian Regieme does not correct their actions.

A significant amount of manpower was dedicated to the planning and execution of this mission. These targets hold a significant role in the processes. Their importance was a major factor in selection tonight. I highly suggest you read some articles and listen to the initial interview provided by the CJCS and Secretary Mattis.

Barnes93cb wrote: ↑Fri Apr 13, 2018 10:38 pm As of tonight the US, UK, and France have launched one of the largest strikes in history. Against the Syrian chemical weapons production, research, and storage capability.

Official numbers on the amount of munitions utilized, what kind, and any losses to coalition partners have not become available to the public.

This was a major response to the continued use of internationally banned chem weapons. As we move forward the US is fully prepared to engage if the Syrian Regieme does not correct their actions.

A significant amount of manpower was dedicated to the planning and execution of this mission. These targets hold a significant role in the processes. Their importance was a major factor in selection tonight. I highly suggest you read some articles and listen to the initial interview provided by the CJCS and Secretary Mattis.

:fuck:

wap wrote: ↑Fri Apr 13, 2018 10:50 pm

Barnes93cb wrote: ↑Fri Apr 13, 2018 10:38 pm As of tonight the US, UK, and France have launched one of the largest strikes in history. Against the Syrian chemical weapons production, research, and storage capability.

Official numbers on the amount of munitions utilized, what kind, and any losses to coalition partners have not become available to the public.

This was a major response to the continued use of internationally banned chem weapons. As we move forward the US is fully prepared to engage if the Syrian Regieme does not correct their actions.

A significant amount of manpower was dedicated to the planning and execution of this mission. These targets hold a significant role in the processes. Their importance was a major factor in selection tonight. I highly suggest you read some articles and listen to the initial interview provided by the CJCS and Secretary Mattis.

If youre interested in the topic. There was some decent information that was passed. And as of now there are no fabricated stories circulating.

dubshow wrote: ↑Fri Apr 13, 2018 10:52 pm:fuck:

Whats the issue?

Did we inform the Russians and did they get their people out.


Sent from the Beer Depository

Calvinball wrote: ↑Sat Apr 14, 2018 12:06 am Did we inform the Russians and did they get their people out.


Sent from the Beer Depository

According to Secretary Mattis we did not inform the Russians of incoming strikes.

Barnes93cb wrote: ↑Sat Apr 14, 2018 12:22 am

Calvinball wrote: ↑Sat Apr 14, 2018 12:06 am Did we inform the Russians and did they get their people out.


Sent from the Beer Depository

According to Secretary Mattis we did not inform the Russians of incoming strikes.

They should’ve expected something the moment the news broke to the western countries about another chem attack.

Barnes93cb wrote:

Calvinball wrote: ↑Sat Apr 14, 2018 12:06 am Did we inform the Russians and did they get their people out.


Sent from the Beer Depository

According to Secretary Mattis we did not inform the Russians of incoming strikes.

Wunderbar.


Sent from the Beer Depository

Calvinball wrote: ↑Sat Apr 14, 2018 12:24 am

Barnes93cb wrote:
According to Secretary Mattis we did not inform the Russians of incoming strikes.

Wunderbar.


Sent from the Beer Depository

We didnt target the Russians. And they are directly facilitating the Syrian govt. I dont think we owed them any heads up.

Russia claiming they (Syria) shout down 70+ missles.

Barnes93cb wrote: ↑Sat Apr 14, 2018 12:22 am

Calvinball wrote: ↑Sat Apr 14, 2018 12:06 am Did we inform the Russians and did they get their people out.


Sent from the Beer Depository

According to Secretary Mattis we did not inform the Russians of incoming strikes.

[user not found] wrote: ↑Sat Apr 14, 2018 8:29 am

4zilch wrote: ↑Sat Apr 14, 2018 7:29 am Russia claiming they (Syria) shout down 70+ missles.

The Brits appear to have had Typhons go in and out uncontested.

KYGTIGuy wrote: ↑Sat Apr 14, 2018 9:12 am

[user not found] wrote: ↑Sat Apr 14, 2018 10:58 am

"They were largely ineffective and increased risk to their own people," he said. “None of our aircraft or missiles involved in this operation were successfully engaged by Syrian air defenses.”

He also said there was no indication that Russian air-defense systems were employed during the attacks.

Interesting for many reasons...

Indeed.

Can't say I'm surprised,

dammit

wap wrote: ↑Sat Apr 14, 2018 11:06 am

[user not found] wrote: ↑Sat Apr 14, 2018 10:58 am

Interesting for many reasons...

Indeed.

Can't say I'm surprised,

Well the cheeto did give the ruskies 48 hours notice...

Gberg2119 wrote: ↑Sat Apr 14, 2018 11:31 am

wap wrote: ↑Sat Apr 14, 2018 11:06 am

Indeed.

Can't say I'm surprised,

Well the cheeto did give the ruskies 48 hours notice...

KYGTIGuy wrote: ↑Sat Apr 14, 2018 12:29 pm

Gberg2119 wrote: ↑Sat Apr 14, 2018 11:31 am

Well the cheeto did give the ruskies 48 hours notice...

There's probably a tweet from years ago to contradict everything he says. He's a total dumbass.

I'm glad it wasn't just us this time. Having the UK and France contribute is big.

Gberg2119 wrote: ↑Sat Apr 14, 2018 1:01 pm

KYGTIGuy wrote: ↑Sat Apr 14, 2018 12:29 pm

There's probably a tweet from years ago to contradict everything he says. He's a total dumbass.

I'm glad it wasn't just us this time. Having the UK and France contribute is big.

I actually think he's right to do what he is doing. Its just a shame to see so many change their opinions based on what party the president is. It's disgusting.

[user not found] wrote: ↑Sat Apr 14, 2018 2:26 pm

KYGTIGuy wrote: ↑Sat Apr 14, 2018 1:53 pm

I actually think he's right to do what he is doing. Its just a shame to see so many change their opinions based on what party the president is. It's disgusting.

Democrats are pretty consistent on this topic it seems.

True, but to be fair, they also don't have an entire cable news Network devoted to feeding them propaganda to sway their opinions.

[user not found] wrote: ↑Sat Apr 14, 2018 11:22 am

wap wrote: ↑Sat Apr 14, 2018 11:06 am

Indeed.

Can't say I'm surprised,

Seems like an opportunity for them to try and find an f-35 BUT you allow mapping of your entire infrastructure.

Plus, if the Ruskies tried and failed to bring down a 35, it would be a public humiliation.