[user not found] wrote:Question for folks that voted for Johnson just because he is a libertarian:
We can all agree he has no real sense of the issues and his overall knowledge is poor. How is this different than any other party line voter?
Sent from and
I didn't vote, and don't really plan to. Louisiana has a hard on for Trumpalicious for some reason. If I did I woulda gone for Johnson. I was sort of pro Johnson till I read about his break down of how the consumption tax would of worked out (or not really worked out). The only reason I'd push his button would be to add % numbers to him to show that people are sick of the 2 party system.
[user not found] wrote: ALSO local elections matter.
Sent from and
Wanna see what's on MY local elections?
Well, state based maybe.
THE DUKES OF HAZZARD!!!!!!!!!!!!
I could totally double dip and go TRUMP/DUKE for a nice oreo racism sandwich!
Husbrandon wrote:A co worker of mine walked into a polling place, wasn't asked for ID or his voters registration. He was just handed a packed an moved on.
I wasn't asked for ID or reg.
But if I was black or hispanic...
In PA they ask for it if it's the first time you've voted at that address or voting location. After that it doesn't matter and you just sign the book.
[user not found] wrote:
Missing the forest for the trees. I am not saying every Gary Johnson voter is uninformed, I'm making the point that the thought process for percentage is similar.
Sent from and
Well i agree..... and thats whay the 'parties' are so out of touch with the populus
Republicunts are guns, Jesus, military, small gov
dems are personal freedom, equal rights, big gov.
People vote on party line because of what they fell more strongly about.
Re: bolded; used to be - and maybe at the state/local level it still is - but at the federal level Republicunts are anything but small govt. The last Republican president signed the largest Medicare expansion since it became law in 1965. He started several conflicts without coming up with a pay to pay for them by way of cuts elsewhere or revenue increases. He took a budget surplus and immediately turned it negative - hooray fiscal conservatism?? Trump wants to cut trillions in taxes over the next decade and borrow trillions more for infrastructure projects, the military, and who knows what other pet projects he has in mind. Both parties want big govt, but only one is honest enough to tell you how we need to pay for it.
Voted Johnson because he's truly fiscally conservative and has a plan to reform entitlements, reduce the size of the military, and actually decrease the size of our govt. That, and Clinton's foreign policy history terrifies me. She'll find a way to escalate things in Syria with Russia within her first 30 days in office. She was a disaster as SOS and is far too hawkish as far as US involvement in foreign conflict is concerned.
Big Brain Bradley wrote:
I would agree with your statement. Blows my mind you did it... you are a curious man.
Three reasons:
1) swing state and I think he isn't just unqualified, but dangerous
2) I'm a foreign policy voter, and even if I could vote libertarian this time around, i can't vote for someone that doesn't know where the flash point for world war three is
3) increased taxes? whatever. Not a big deal. And anyone that thinks Hil is going to attempt significant changes to gun control in her first term is out of their mind or truly doesn't understand poltics.
Sent from and
Where are these mangos?
Detroit wrote: ↑Fri Apr 16, 2021 1:19 pm
I don't understand anything anymore.
Desertbreh wrote: ↑Thu Oct 17, 2019 3:05 pm
DFD. The forum where everybody makes the same choices and then tells anybody trying to join the club that they are the stupidest motherfucker to ever walk the earth.
and
ol: KY one of the first states called. Trump NAILED it 65 to 30.
biter.
