I think the Image is important and how the car makes you fucking feel at the end of the day. Having kids is not giving up on life for ex. Some compromise to maintain some sort of "fun" is valid.Johnny_P wrote: ↑Tue Jul 08, 2025 10:01 am I think it comes down to this. If you have a shitload of kids are you actually worried about “image” or are you just after the best / most functional solution? Vans are pretty lame, sure. But they’re easier to live with if you’re constantly packing the littles in. For many people that functionality and the ease of use will reign supreme.
As the kids get bigger and into boosters the van becomes less necessary IMO. Because they can then climb into vehicles better, buckle themselves, whatever. For the parents at least. The kids will continue to like the van a hell of a lot more.
I have 2 sisters and 1 brother. We had minivans the switched to a Fraud Expedition. The SUV was fucking awful compared to the vans.
Some people overdo it and strap infants to the roof of a 911. And go "skiing with a lamBRO"
The opposite spectrum is buying a fugly shit van and saying "my life is over anyways so what do I care"
There is plenty of "life" in the middle and that's why those choices are popular.
Both my cars for ex are technically minivans, one a two row and one a 3 row. But one has a 560hp and the other over 600... do I feel like I want to die every night? no. Would I prefer a van because its more "practical" ?! fuck no.
The other example is commuting in a gti vs a prius, yes they are both fugly hatchbacks but one is actually fun and you're not giving up. A minivan and it's stigma is SOOOO FAR off the "caring" scale that its a symbol of giving up, getting a gut and just being an absolute CUCK and actually using that hotel chair on the regular. It is what it is...