Curious to see what it goes for and contemplating throwing in a bid. This would be an epic

Old Audis will have old Audi problems... the mileage discrepancy is weird, seems like just a typo by a dingus though.max225 wrote: ↑Tue Apr 29, 2025 12:24 pm October 2023 (85,135 miles): Water pump replaced, multipoint inspection performed
February 2022 (75,251 miles): 75,000-mile service performed, alignment performed, multipoint inspection performed, front driveshaft outer boot replaced, rear shocks replaced
November 2021: Clutch and flywheel kit purchased
May 2021 (44,283 miles): Rear main seal replaced, engine speed sensor replaced, multipoint inspection performed, key fob battery replaced
The attached Carfax history report indicates the following services have been completed:
October 2024 (87,075 miles): Maintenance inspection completed
January 2023 (80,926 miles): Control arm(s) replaced, CV boot(s) replaced, four-wheel alignment performed, front brake pads replaced, hood prop rod replaced, oil and filter changed
December 2021 (73,801 miles): Engine mount(s) replaced, oil and filter changed, transmission fluid changed
January 2021 (67,331 miles): front brake rotor(s) and pads replaced, rear brake pads replaced, noise checked, oil and filter changed
This history is fairly wild …
Something weird about the mileage during the rear main in seal in may
It looks looks to be $3000 a year in maintenance... starting in 2021... possibly 5000-6000 if you don't have a good indie. That's not insignificant and shockingly consistent.D Griff wrote: ↑Tue Apr 29, 2025 12:48 pmOld Audis will have old Audi problems... the mileage discrepancy is weird, seems like just a typo by a dingus though.max225 wrote: ↑Tue Apr 29, 2025 12:24 pm October 2023 (85,135 miles): Water pump replaced, multipoint inspection performed
February 2022 (75,251 miles): 75,000-mile service performed, alignment performed, multipoint inspection performed, front driveshaft outer boot replaced, rear shocks replaced
November 2021: Clutch and flywheel kit purchased
May 2021 (44,283 miles): Rear main seal replaced, engine speed sensor replaced, multipoint inspection performed, key fob battery replaced
The attached Carfax history report indicates the following services have been completed:
October 2024 (87,075 miles): Maintenance inspection completed
January 2023 (80,926 miles): Control arm(s) replaced, CV boot(s) replaced, four-wheel alignment performed, front brake pads replaced, hood prop rod replaced, oil and filter changed
December 2021 (73,801 miles): Engine mount(s) replaced, oil and filter changed, transmission fluid changed
January 2021 (67,331 miles): front brake rotor(s) and pads replaced, rear brake pads replaced, noise checked, oil and filter changed
This history is fairly wild …
Something weird about the mileage during the rear main in seal in may
it's tempting to me but I think a ten year old Audi will have some problems. If bought for not much money I would be OK with dumping some in as things happen.
A newer STI is probably a better buy - far less depreciation and far lessto deal with.
Id say this is consistent with about 75% of Audis I’ve seen. Although around me you’ll also see a lot of damaged/repaired wheels, premature tire replacements, etc.max225 wrote: ↑Tue Apr 29, 2025 12:24 pm October 2023 (85,135 miles): Water pump replaced, multipoint inspection performed
February 2022 (75,251 miles): 75,000-mile service performed, alignment performed, multipoint inspection performed, front driveshaft outer boot replaced, rear shocks replaced
November 2021: Clutch and flywheel kit purchased
May 2021 (44,283 miles): Rear main seal replaced, engine speed sensor replaced, multipoint inspection performed, key fob battery replaced
The attached Carfax history report indicates the following services have been completed:
October 2024 (87,075 miles): Maintenance inspection completed
January 2023 (80,926 miles): Control arm(s) replaced, CV boot(s) replaced, four-wheel alignment performed, front brake pads replaced, hood prop rod replaced, oil and filter changed
December 2021 (73,801 miles): Engine mount(s) replaced, oil and filter changed, transmission fluid changed
January 2021 (67,331 miles): front brake rotor(s) and pads replaced, rear brake pads replaced, noise checked, oil and filter changed
This history is fairly wild …
Something weird about the mileage during the rear main in seal in may
Yeah, the cost of ownershit is high, especially when you consider the value floor is like $2500.max225 wrote: ↑Tue Apr 29, 2025 12:55 pmIt looks looks to be $3000 a year in maintenance... starting in 2021... possibly 5000-6000 if you don't have a good indie. That's not insignificant and shockingly consistent.D Griff wrote: ↑Tue Apr 29, 2025 12:48 pm
Old Audis will have old Audi problems... the mileage discrepancy is weird, seems like just a typo by a dingus though.
it's tempting to me but I think a ten year old Audi will have some problems. If bought for not much money I would be OK with dumping some in as things happen.
A newer STI is probably a better buy - far less depreciation and far lessto deal with.
BUT is a 1.5TD Griff wrote: ↑Tue Apr 29, 2025 1:09 pmYeah, the cost of ownershit is high, especially when you consider the value floor is like $2500.
I think from aperspective, Civic Si is pretty epic. Reliable, cheap to buy new, used with 25K miles is still worth MSRP apparently. I could buy one and own it until 2030 for next to nothing.
Yep. That’s right. If you’re ok with that motor there is almost nothing that comes close to the value prop.D Griff wrote: ↑Tue Apr 29, 2025 1:09 pmYeah, the cost of ownershit is high, especially when you consider the value floor is like $2500.
I think from aperspective, Civic Si is pretty epic. Reliable, cheap to buy new, used with 25K miles is still worth MSRP apparently. I could buy one and own it until 2030 for next to nothing.
Yea that 1.5T is pretty atrocious… from that perspective. You’d peg it at redline to be outrun by the average vanGberg2119 wrote: ↑Tue Apr 29, 2025 1:16 pmBUT is a 1.5TD Griff wrote: ↑Tue Apr 29, 2025 1:09 pm
Yeah, the cost of ownershit is high, especially when you consider the value floor is like $2500.
I think from aperspective, Civic Si is pretty epic. Reliable, cheap to buy new, used with 25K miles is still worth MSRP apparently. I could buy one and own it until 2030 for next to nothing.
really that exciting?
Exciting? Def no, but I think JP's points are also valid, it is adequate and allows ripping through gears, similar to some of the fun an 86 offers.Gberg2119 wrote: ↑Tue Apr 29, 2025 1:16 pmBUT is a 1.5TD Griff wrote: ↑Tue Apr 29, 2025 1:09 pm
Yeah, the cost of ownershit is high, especially when you consider the value floor is like $2500.
I think from aperspective, Civic Si is pretty epic. Reliable, cheap to buy new, used with 25K miles is still worth MSRP apparently. I could buy one and own it until 2030 for next to nothing.
really that exciting?
Yea the point is it’s not 1995 anymore. Which is when 0-60 in 7 seconds would have been ok. The GTIJohnny_P wrote: ↑Tue Apr 29, 2025 1:29 pm I dunno a close ratio manual and scoots to 60 under 7 seconds seems dece to me. I never felt my MK6 GTI was slow or needed more power - this is similar. Actually kind of fun because you can rip through 3 gears without going to jail.
The 1.5T with the CVT combo was pretty off putting though.
Im not disagreeing that it’s slower than the competition. But if it’s geared right it could be more fun in normal driving than the GTI which every review has said the manual sucks and is geared way too tall.max225 wrote: ↑Tue Apr 29, 2025 1:54 pmYea the point is it’s not 1995 anymore. Which is when 0-60 in 7 seconds would have been ok. The GTIJohnny_P wrote: ↑Tue Apr 29, 2025 1:29 pm I dunno a close ratio manual and scoots to 60 under 7 seconds seems dece to me. I never felt my MK6 GTI was slow or needed more power - this is similar. Actually kind of fun because you can rip through 3 gears without going to jail.
The 1.5T with the CVT combo was pretty off putting though.
Traps at almost 10 mph more than the shitvic and almost 2 seconds faster … The performance gap or lack of straight line speed in the civic is real
Link me plz. I heard the
Savagegeese on YouTube was pretty adamant about that in his last GTI review.
Also... I've driven a bunch of GTIs and Civics. I've owned both. Civics have way better manuals than GTIs, this has been true since at least the mid 90s, I haven't driven earlier ones. Also, Japanese cars in general just have better manuals than Euro cars do.Johnny_P wrote: ↑Wed Apr 30, 2025 9:01 amSavagegeese on YouTube was pretty adamant about that in his last GTI review.
Motor trend recently admitted they don’t care that the 2025 has no manual.
https://www.motortrend.com/reviews/2025 ... ive-review
I don’t think the point of the gti having a worse manual than the civic was contested. More like the gti having a “bad one”D Griff wrote: ↑Wed Apr 30, 2025 9:04 amAlso... I've driven a bunch of GTIs and Civics. I've owned both. Civics have way better manuals than GTIs, this has been true since at least the mid 90s, I haven't driven earlier ones. Also, Japanese cars in general just have better manuals than Euro cars do.Johnny_P wrote: ↑Wed Apr 30, 2025 9:01 am
Savagegeese on YouTube was pretty adamant about that in his last GTI review.
Motor trend recently admitted they don’t care that the 2025 has no manual.
https://www.motortrend.com/reviews/2025 ... ive-review
BMWs have some of the worst, VW is typically a little better IMO, but still not top notch.
IF you end up with a
You really want the sport diff unless you get one so cheap you can't be chooseyD Griff wrote: ↑Tue Apr 29, 2025 11:52 am Been watching this S4 and man... tempting https://carsandbids.com/auctions/92oVg2 ... ref=lr_1_2
Curious to see what it goes for and contemplating throwing in a bid. This would be an epicride for $10-15K.
100% my favorite thing I did to my GTI.
I'm so OG I
Desertbreh wrote: I'm happy for Brad because nobody jerks it to the Miata harder on this forum and that is the Crown Prince of Miatas.D Griff wrote: Inserting 'nobody jerks it harder to the Miata than Brad' quote.
golftdibrad1 wrote: ↑Wed Apr 30, 2025 11:14 amI'm so OG Igetting a dieselgeek short shifter for my mk4 tdi. He only sold things for diesels, and got into other makes models because the cheap ish OEM+ upgrade of using a TT shifter only shortened the up and down 1-2, 3-4, 5 throw but not side to side; felt funny and asymmetrical. So you would order the kit that was modded OEM parts to shorten everything, and send yours back as a core to be made into more.
https://web.archive.org/web/20040205004 ... 4NB_SS.htm
The DAP shifter does side to side as well. Maybe the older cars needed side to side but I felt like the current sigma six is perfect.golftdibrad1 wrote: ↑Wed Apr 30, 2025 11:14 amI'm so OG Igetting a dieselgeek short shifter for my mk4 tdi. He only sold things for diesels, and got into other makes models because the cheap ish OEM+ upgrade of using a TT shifter only shortened the up and down 1-2, 3-4, 5 throw but not side to side; felt funny and asymmetrical. So you would order the kit that was modded OEM parts to shorten everything, and send yours back as a core to be made into more.
https://web.archive.org/web/20040205004 ... 4NB_SS.htm