COVID-19: the aftermath

[dubshow]

Bueller? Buellller?

[golftdibrad1]

https://alexberenson.substack.com/p/urg ... a-lab-leak

more in depth analysis of the confirmation that Fauci and the NIH funded the creation of a virus that is responsible for at a minimum making every person on the planet sick and cost millions of lost man hour productivity through the same.

On Wednesday morning, as American outlets festooned themselves in Covid retrospectives, two big German newspapers - Zeit and Süddeutsche Zeitung1 -broke some actual news.

Turns out in early 2020, Angela Merkel, Germany’s chancellor, took a break from her busy schedule of welcoming knife-wielding Afghan refugees to ask Germany’s intelligence agency, the BND2, to figure out Covid’s origins.

You remember early 2020! The Science (TM) was very powerful back then. Dr. Anthony S. Fauci and Peter Daszak — a British zoologist Fauci had never met, except he had — were gently steering their fellow scientists towards a conclusion that Covid’s origins were 100 billion zillion percent natural.

By gently steering, I mean accusing anyone who even mentioned the weird coincidence that the epidemic started about 50 feet outside the world’s most prolific coronavirus research lab3 of committing thoughtcrimes against humanity.

The Fauci/Daszak campaign proved a success, thanks to the useful idiots in the American media, who were never more useful (to China) or more idiotic than in 2020.

—

But the BND had its own sources. And the agency concluded with 80 percent to 95 percent certainty that the virus had in fact leaked from a Chinese lab. As a German press agency reported Wednesday, summarizing the Zeit/SZ articles:

The BND based its conclusion on the analysis of material from the public domain and that it collected in the course of an investigation with the code name "Saaremaa."

The material… indicated that there had been some risky research methods used there [at the Wuhan Institute of Virology, compounded by breaches of laboratory safety rules… [and] so-called gain-of-function experiments, in which viruses occurring in nature are manipulated [to become more dangerous or transmissible].

After Merkel left office in 2021, the BND told her replacement, Olaf Scholz, “without the results finding their way to the public” — as the British newspaper The Telegraph delicately put it.

Now, thanks to what is sometimes called “reporting,” they have. The German government isn’t denying the articles, so there’s about a 100 to 100 percent chance they’re true.

The worst part is that we all sorta knew this already, right? Both the lab leak and the coverup.

But there’s knowing and there’s knowing. And it looks like the same American news outlets that spent 2020 and 2021 lying (or, at best, being hopelessly credulous) about China and Covid still aren’t ready to come clean.

[golftdibrad1]

https://rescue.substack.com/p/serious-q ... -for-fauci

i want answers, and more importantly, indictments.

[golftdibrad1]

Measles smeasels. And the one kid that dided was mistreated, and his parents should sue the piss out the hospital.

https://alexberenson.substack.com/p/nev ... lth-crisis

Alex Berenson
Mar 25, 2025
Sometimes you can’t let the science get in the way of The Science (TM).

Or the truth get in the way of a good woke-shaming exercise.

To ensure diverse opinions, The New York Times offers many types of insufferable lefty columnists, including feminist, environmentalist, literaryish, and Southern. The categories are not exclusive. If readers are really lucky, a writer can be all four at once!

Ladies and gentlemen, meet Margaret Renkl. She usually offers readers tales of daisies blooming with a side of Trump hate. They’re as scintillating as you imagine.

Renkl is 63. Renkl just got a measles vaccine. I know this because — as her contribution to the media hysteria over a measles “epidemic” that is actually part of a predictable once-every-five-years cycle — she described getting jabbed in a piece called, Why I Got the Measles Vaccine at Age 63.

—

(Reading The Times so you don’t have to. That’s gotta be worth 20 cents a day!)

—

Why indeed? Especially since Renkl acknowledges she was in fact vaccinated against measles as a kid. Honest answers would include:

1: I was looking for something to write about and I figured my odds of Guillain-Barre syndrome were low.

2: I needed to virtue signal and I was afraid to vandalize a Tesla, so many cameras, ugh.

3: I’m weirdly scared of measles, and all these articles have triggered me.

Now any of those columns would have been funny and interesting. So, no.

Instead Renkl offered a tortured justification about how her childhood vaccination might not protect her from measles, though she didn’t bother to check if she still had antibodies before getting the shot. That would have been too much trouble (and might have killed the column).

No, Renkl mainly wanted us to know: she’s a good person. A very good person. Better than anyone who voted for Donald Trump, for sure.

My own safety wasn’t my chief concern. Doing everything I can to protect my fellow human beings who cannot be vaccinated… seems to me to be the only moral thing to do for anyone living in close community with other people. And that’s almost all of us.

Community is a concept that the MAGA movement is working overtime to undo…

Yes, getting a measles shot - even if you may already have antibodies against measles, even if you are not at any meaningful risk of getting measles - is THE ONLY MORAL THING TO DO, PEOPLE.

And here I thought it was a pointless waste of medical resources.

I am obviously not a moral person. I apologize. Please excuse me while I find a dog to kick.

—

(More proof I’m not a moral person. I am kinda funny sometimes, though.)


—

All of this would be typical Times wokeness, except that early in the column Renkl and her editors showed us just how much they care about facts. In her second paragraph, she wrote that when her first child was born in 1992:

There was no reason for his pediatrician to warn me that I needed to keep him away from anyone who wasn’t vaccinated against other deadly infectious diseases. Before the internet deluded people into believing that an online search was commensurate with a medical degree, vaccination rates were high enough in this country to provide de facto herd immunity.

What Renkl wrote wasn’t just wrong or mistaken. It was the opposite of the truth.

For months, legacy media outlets have tried to fan hysteria around a new American measles “epidemic.” In reality, this year’s increase is predictable. Even “Your Local Epidemiologist,” a woke Substacker, acknowledged this a week ago, explaining that “Measles cases surge every five years for reasons we don’t fully understand.”1

Nor have American childhood vaccination rates changed much for decades. They rose a bit during the 2010s, and have fallen a bit since 2020. Given how much public health experts lied about lockdowns, masks, and the mRNA Covid shots, the surprise isn’t that rates are down — it’s that they’re not down more.2

—

(You can’t handle the truth! Well, you can. Renkl can’t.)

—

The big falsehood in the paragraph, though, is one Renkl may not even know is a lie.

The worst measles epidemic in the last 40 years took place in, wait for it, 1989 and 1990, when over 45,000 Americans were infected — almost 200 times as many as have been infected so far this year. A number of children died, too.

The outbreak received modest media attention, though nothing like the hysteria that Renkl and the gang have piled on this winter. The reason may have had something to do with the fact that the outbreak was centered in poor black and Hispanic communities in New York City — groups that reporters did not view as appropriate targets for vaccination shaming campaigns (unlike Mennonites or Orthodox Jews).


—

The epidemic lasted through 1991, when almost 10,000 Americans got measles. Even in 1992, the number was 2,200 — more than the last five years combined.

So, yeah, Renkl doesn’t know what she’s talking about.

But when has that ever stopped a woke public health scold before?

The more interesting question: Why didn’t Renkl’s pediatrician mention measles 33 years back? (Assuming any part of that conversation happened.) And the answer is that the doctor probably viewed the risk as no big deal — a minor threat to be avoided through vaccination if possible, but not hardly worth upsetting a new parent over.

My, how times have changed.

Expect the Times and Renkl to correct their mistakes and return to reality on the 12th of Never.

1
The two previous spikes were in 2014 and 2019; the Covid lockdowns pushed the cycle back a year.

2
As most of you know, I think the measles vaccine offers a good risk-benefit ratio and my own kids have now received all the standard shots. But I understand why so many Unreported Truths readers are suspicious of ALL public-health advice at this point.

[D Griff]

Your boner for this is a lot weirder than your boner for Miatas.

[Desertbreh]

Your boner for this is a lot weirder than your boner for Miatas.

Brad, do you levy on your wife all the time on this topic? Or is this your blowoff valve? It is an impressively unending hard-on.

[golftdibrad1]

Your boner for this is a lot weirder than your boner for Miatas.

Its less weird than furry boners

Your boner for this is a lot weirder than your boner for Miatas.

Brad, do you levy on your wife all the time on this topic? Or is this your blowoff valve? It is an impressively unending hard-on.

We talk about the state of things and have a good rant about it about once a week. We are very philosophically aligned on this topic. She was way more anti-vax than I was pre-covid, FWIW. As nurse she got to see the ineffectiveness and damage first hand. We had a fairly large disagreement about getting the kid 'fully' vaxed with the std schedule. I now have to admit she was correct about the lack of need, ineffectiveness, and (we'll say generously as possible) questionable side effect profile for the vast majority of the childhood schedule.

[golftdibrad1]

https://alexberenson.substack.com/p/imm ... eated-mrna

Immune changes from repeated mRNA jabs are linked to a higher risk of Covid
A new paper finds more shots equals more IgG4 antibodies and more Covid cases! That's how vaccines are supposed to work, right?

The bestest vaccines ever keep getting bester.

In late 2022, German researchers published a shocking report: repeated mRNA Covid shots from Pfizer and Moderna made people produce more of what are called IgG4 antibodies, a change that might hurt the immune system’s ability to fight Covid.

Now Spanish scientists have shown the risk is real, reporting that mRNA-jabbed people with high levels of IgG4 antibodies are more likely to get Covid over and over.

The Spanish study, published last week, backs the anecdotal evidence of frequent Covid infections in people who have received repeated mRNA boosters. And it again raises the question if the mRNAs have caused long-term immune system damage.

Enjoy your IgG4 class switching and heart damage.

Also, enjoy the red pills

[golftdibrad1]

Flu shots dont even work, and lead to more deaths in the very people they are supposed to protect. CBS said so!

https://metatron.substack.com/p/flu-jab ... or-decades

[golftdibrad1]

MOAR
monday was a spicy C&C
https://www.coffeeandcovid.com/p/buggin ... ch-31-2025

brain cancer clusters you say? We know the jabs had dna contamanation, RNA errors above acceptable rates, and that some vials/ batches were 'hot'. Why so much of the same thing showing up in one place? IDK, maybe because they all got the same batch that was fucked up.

Three days ago, CBS ran a terrifying story headlined, “Nurses at Massachusetts hospital concerned about growing number of cancer cases among staff.” Before you ask, no, CBS did not report any official urgency to figure out the cause of this cluster of brain cancers among hospital frontline workers. Just the opposite.

image 5.png
In fact, CBS couldn’t find any individual official to confirm what the nurses at Newton-Wellesly Hospital in Massachusetts claimed. Why would healthcare officials bother with it? Why comment about the bizarre cluster among frontline nurses on the same floor? Who needs frontline workers anyway? It’s not like they are heroes or anything.

The paper relied almost exclusively on reports from the nurses themselves. The hospital told CBS reporters it “was investigating.” All it said was that it had interviewed ten nurses, six of whom have various different brain tumors. It issued a short statement summarizing that the hospital’s investigation had cleared the hospital. Whew! “The investigation found no environmental risks which could be linked to the development of a brain tumor,” the statement claimed.

So … everything’s fine! Just another weird cancer coinkeydink! Nothing to see here.

Ominously, the nurse quoted in the story said she was afraid to give her name—why? Afraid of who? The story didn’t say. The maternity nurse told WBZ-TV that she’d just been diagnosed with a brain tumor. She said she wasn’t the first. "It's getting to the point where the number just increases, and you start saying, am I crazy thinking this?” She finished, "This can't just be a coincidence."

The nurse’s claims were confirmed by the hospital’s quasi-admission. She said ten nurses who work on the maternity floor have been diagnosed with different brain tumors over the last few years, some cancerous and some not. Ten! Her story matched the hospital’s report that it had interviewed ten nurses and found six cancers. In other words, ten tumors, six cancers.

But CBS did not connect that dot, at least, not explicitly.

But the reporter did give us all those facts, so we could connect the dots ourselves. That’s some progress. Still, the story disappointingly ended abruptly, reiterating only that the hospital had cleared itself of any wrongdoing.

Despite the fact this kind of alarming and mysterious health threat has always, until the pandemic, been catnip for media, CBS dropped it. No curiosity at all. No interviews with other experts. No attempt to talk to the other nine nurses. They just left the tumors laying there, on the maternity ward floor.

Case closed.

Now, guess which word was conspicuously absent from the story? Yep, the v-word. Vaccine. Seven letters, absent without leave. We can guess— but CBS didn’t tell us whether those ten maternity-ward nurses were all mRNA-injected on the same day from the same batch. And they never, ever will.

Oh well. It would be wild speculation to blame the jabs. Don’t get crazy.

[golftdibrad1]

and there it is, the germans and Japanese have discovered a possible mechanism as to WHY the mRNA jabs cause cancer.

https://alexberenson.substack.com/p/urg ... ge-genetic

URGENT: mRNA Covid jabs change genetic structures in ways linked to cancer and autoimmune disorders
Scientists call the changes caused by the Pfizer and Moderna shots "epigenetic" - they occur around DNA's core and activate genes in ways that can promote tumor growth.
Alex Berenson
Mar 31, 2025
mRNA vaccination causes long-term changes in a crucial part of our chromosomes — changes previously linked to inflammatory and autoimmune diseases and cancers including leukemia and brain tumors.

The finding came in a peer-reviewed paper from German researchers last week. The discovery might help explain post-mRNA jab “inflammatory diseases which occur in… [some] vaccinated individuals,” the researchers wrote.

In a discussion with outside reviewers that was published along with the paper, the researchers suggested the changes they found are “very likely” occurring in bone marrow cells, the source of all blood cells. Their finding comes as other researchers report rising deaths from leukemia - a blood cancer - in very highly vaccinated Japan.

[golftdibrad1]

The "measles outbreak" in TX is manufactured.

https://www.malone.news/p/measles-propaganda

[golftdibrad1]

Want the flu? Get your shot!

https://alexberenson.substack.com/p/urg ... ived-a-flu

URGENT: People who received a flu shot this winter were MORE likely to get the flu, a major new study shows
Flu shots don't work. We need to stop pretending they do. They should be pulled from the market unless and until large, long-term placebo-controlled studies prove they're safe and effective.
Alex Berenson
Apr 08, 2025
A big new study has offered yet more evidence that flu shots do not work - and may sometimes even increase the chances people will get influenza.

With flu deaths in the United States soaring in 2025 despite aggressive vaccination efforts, when will public health bureaucrats admit the truth of their failure?

Adults who received a flu shot were 27 percent more likely to get the flu this winter, Cleveland Clinic researchers found. You read that right. Their risk was higher.

“We were unable to find that the influenza vaccine has been effective in preventing infection,” the researchers wrote, in a masterpiece of understatement.

—

(No understatement. No overstatement. Just the truth. For less than 20 cents a day.)

—

The study covered 53,400 adults in Ohio for six months, a big enough group that the results reached statistical significance, meaning they almost surely were not due to chance.

The researchers posted the results as a “preprint” on Friday, meaning their findings has not yet been subject to peer review. But the study design and outcome look solid.

They looked at influenza infections among Ohio-based employees at the Cleveland Clinic, which includes more than 55,000 workers at the flagship hospital, several smaller medical centers, and walk-in clinics.

The Clinic requires its employees to get flu shots, but about 20 percent claimed medical and religious exemptions and refused during the 2024-2025 flu season. So researchers could compare almost 44,000 people who received shots in the fall of 2024 with almost 10,000 who did not.

They found that by late March 2025, over 2 percent of people who had received the jab had a documented flu infection. Only about 1.5 percent of people who had not gotten the jab had an infection. The gap grew sharply during the last few weeks of the study.

The negative effectiveness remained even after the researchers adjusted for age, sex, where the employees worked, and whether they were nurses, who might be more exposed to the flu than other employees.

The researchers also found that unvaccinated and vaccinated people had positive test results at roughly the same rates, suggesting that higher flu rates in the vaccinated probably didn’t come from the fact that they were somewhat more likely to be tested.

[golftdibrad1]

These people still out there with broken fucking brains. cant even hold job at mcd's or applebees

timestamped for your pleasure

[golftdibrad1]

how bout some spice for your monday morning.

[golftdibrad1]

I think we might see some indictments for the covid bullshit finally. I'm here for it. I hope that the guy from the facetube reel above gets what we all want just like him, and the delay has been the administration biding time and gathering evidence.

Go to www.covid.gov

It's there, all of it. All the crap we were all called crazy conspiracy theorists for. The shit they attempted to alienate us from society over. Its there, with receipts.

No use for me to waste effort and try and out opine the bad cat on this, so just go read this. Or don't, because you guys are busy beating it in the chair.

https://boriquagato.substack.com/p/brea ... e-it-comes

[golftdibrad1]

Did the Pope die of a vaccine injury? We will never know. God almost certainly won't be delivering the truth to him anytime soon, as I'm sure he will have a long ass stay in purgatory for his sins as the most woke pope ever.

https://www.coffeeandcovid.com/p/mement ... il-22-2025

[golftdibrad1]

https://www.yahoo.com/news/rfk-jr-requi ... 38181.html

BOOM

[golftdibrad1]

yet another debunk of 'safe and effective'

even among the vaxed you had statistically significant different all cause death rates (non-covid-19 too) depending on WHICH shot you took.

https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101 ... .full-text

[golftdibrad1]

elections have consequences, sometimes good ones. We need congress to pass legislation on an outright ban however.

https://x.com/AutismCapital/status/1919499701654614091