![:thankstrump: :thankstrump:](./images/smilies/thankstrump.gif)
Dat silent majority is confident in the 80 month financing ... incentives up 13% yoy
Vw up 25% as predicted with the turn ins ...
If it weren't for this, sales would have tanked. We're beyond natural demand at this point, reiterating why now is the best time ever to lease a new vehicle.maxtdi wrote:
Dat silent majority is confident in the 80 month financing ... incentives up 13% yoy
Vw up 25% as predicted with the turn ins ...
Desertbreh wrote: ↑Tue Oct 10, 2017 6:40 pm My guess would be that Chris took some time off because he has read the dialogue on this page 1,345 times and decided to spend some of his free time doing something besides beating a horse to death.
You work for a big 3 auto entity and expect them to encourage a 'natural' state of sales, ie, a rational decline??? You are brave LOLDetroit wrote:If it weren't for this, sales would have tanked. We're beyond natural demand at this point, reiterating why now is the best time ever to lease a new vehicle.maxtdi wrote:
Dat silent majority is confident in the 80 month financing ... incentives up 13% yoy
Vw up 25% as predicted with the turn ins ...
My hope is the industry will wise up and let sales fall to natural in January with lower spending. We'll see...
Right, profit. Over producing and throwing piles of cash on the hood does not equal profit. I actually have some faith that my company is smarter than the rest, but we'll see...Davestr wrote:You work for a big 3 auto entity and expect them to encourage a 'natural' state of sales, ie, a rational decline??? You are brave LOLDetroit wrote: If it weren't for this, sales would have tanked. We're beyond natural demand at this point, reiterating why now is the best time ever to lease a new vehicle.
My hope is the industry will wise up and let sales fall to natural in January with lower spending. We'll see...Can I remind you of what drives their agenda =
![]()
Desertbreh wrote: ↑Tue Oct 10, 2017 6:40 pm My guess would be that Chris took some time off because he has read the dialogue on this page 1,345 times and decided to spend some of his free time doing something besides beating a horse to death.
Under the King Trump, we are all too big to fail and make Murica great again....its all good mang....just press on and produce....they have a plan for all of usDetroit wrote:Right, profit. Over producing and throwing piles of cash on the hood does not equal profit. I actually have some faith that my company is smarter than the rest, but we'll see...Davestr wrote:
You work for a big 3 auto entity and expect them to encourage a 'natural' state of sales, ie, a rational decline??? You are brave LOLCan I remind you of what drives their agenda =
![]()
[user not found] wrote:Yep.Tarspin wrote:The issue comes down the units sold. The factory considers the units sold as soon as they are built. Profits are dispensed based on units sold. The dealers are a whole separate entity. They put in their orders, and also need to carry a certain min quantity of each model. If the factories build too many units the Corp shovels them onto dealers whether they like it or not. Usually there is an order count (say 12-20 days if healthy demand and as high as 50 days for a hot model). Sadly cars should be built to orders.
We've got an inventory of over 100 cars here, it's ridiculous.
You can't do that with MINIs.
Desertbreh wrote: ↑Tue Oct 10, 2017 6:40 pm My guess would be that Chris took some time off because he has read the dialogue on this page 1,345 times and decided to spend some of his free time doing something besides beating a horse to death.
Exactly why I posted what I did in response to Detroit.Tarspin wrote:The issue comes down the units sold. The factory considers the units sold as soon as they are built. Profits are dispensed based on units sold. The dealers are a whole separate entity. They put in their orders, and also need to carry a certain min quantity of each model. If the factories build too many units the Corp shovels them onto dealers whether they like it or not. Usually there is an order count (say 12-20 days if healthy demand and as high as 50 days for a hot model). Sadly cars should be built to orders.
Yep and nothing has changed since the last crash. Bail outs will MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN!!!maxtdi wrote:The supply chain is very complicated... you build 1000 cars, and they cost $25000 a piece, you build 2000 cars and they cost 20,000 a piece. So they more you make the MORE you can discount. So the discount becomes semi irrelevant. You have to put all pieces in perspective.
If you don't utilize the chain fully you can't make money. That's why the industry failed in 2008, it is NOT set up for low production numbers.
The argument was... bail out or not bail out... you bail em out .. of course this happens... you don't bail em out... Detroit of today would be worse than Mad-Max.Davestr wrote:Yep and nothing has changed since the last crash. Bail outs will MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN!!!maxtdi wrote:The supply chain is very complicated... you build 1000 cars, and they cost $25000 a piece, you build 2000 cars and they cost 20,000 a piece. So they more you make the MORE you can discount. So the discount becomes semi irrelevant. You have to put all pieces in perspective.
If you don't utilize the chain fully you can't make money. That's why the industry failed in 2008, it is NOT set up for low production numbers.![]()
Yep thismaxtdi wrote:The argument was... bail out or not bail out... you bail em out .. of course this happens... you don't bail em out... Detroit of today would be worse than Mad-Max.Davestr wrote:
Yep and nothing has changed since the last crash. Bail outs will MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN!!!![]()
Personally... as much as I hate the fact that the .gov blew a few billion on the bail out... it saved jobs Carrier style... and kept them here. If we didn't we'd be getting all our cars from china
This isn't exactly right though. Focusing on an hourly wage isn't the point.Davestr wrote:Since 2000, the United States has hemorrhaged around 5 million manufacturing jobs, according to NBC News. The Carrier workers in Mexico will make $3 an hour, compared with the $20 an hour paid to their U.S. counterparts, according to Reuters.** And the company confirmed on Thursday that it got a multiyear, $7 million package from the state of Indiana in exchange for keeping 1,000 jobs there.
700 Carrier jobs are still leaving. Trump got work to do and in fact wont make much impact on whats been gone for years. The market will still purge inefficiency over time. New plants will be further automated with even fewer jobs. He is fighting the wrong battle - Automation is the enemy for the mid and long term.
Corps will maxi profit and chase labor until labor is replaced and automated. Its a no win situation. I dont see the US Gov taking it too seriously and its impacting China already. We are not focusing on the cause at all. Trade deals might not help but automation is expanding faster than anyone suspects. Good luck putting the brakes on it. Im glad Trump saved a few jobs. Its not even close to being enough and dont get me started on the labor sitting around not being retrained. US Corps dont seem to overtly care and what impetus is coming from the Gov seems to be a ghost. The jobs are gone and are not coming back. Wall St is losing jobs to automation as well. Its ugly.maxtdi wrote:This isn't exactly right though. Focusing on an hourly wage isn't the point.Davestr wrote:Since 2000, the United States has hemorrhaged around 5 million manufacturing jobs, according to NBC News. The Carrier workers in Mexico will make $3 an hour, compared with the $20 an hour paid to their U.S. counterparts, according to Reuters.** And the company confirmed on Thursday that it got a multiyear, $7 million package from the state of Indiana in exchange for keeping 1,000 jobs there.
700 Carrier jobs are still leaving. Trump got work to do and in fact wont make much impact on whats been gone for years. The market will still purge inefficiency over time. New plants will be further automated with even fewer jobs. He is fighting the wrong battle - Automation is the enemy for the mid and long term.
a company still has to invest millions/billions in foreign entities to make shit happen. Which is why you have China as the richest country on earth now. We have to play the game right.
The outsource mentality has to stop. Cheap global shipping has made a lot of crazy things happen overtime.
Desertbreh wrote: ↑Tue Oct 10, 2017 6:40 pm My guess would be that Chris took some time off because he has read the dialogue on this page 1,345 times and decided to spend some of his free time doing something besides beating a horse to death.
Um no excess capacity ? BruhDetroit wrote:
How many times do I have to post that the manufacturing situation is WAY different than in 2008? There is no excess capacity. No plants barely surviving. Every plant is at 100% max capacity right now. So, reducing volume doesn't really hurt as much as it did in 2008. Sure, people get laid off, but you're not spending billions shuttering wasted plants. THAT was the problem in 2008.
Yes, the finance game is there where the more you produce, the better you can amortize the cost of such production. But internal accounting (at least at GM) isn't set up entirely like that. Profit is determined on a per unit basis, labor, assembly, shipping, etc is determined based on production volume...which is now set by market size, not the volume required to keep a plant alive. These are two very different accounting methods...the latter being what tanked the industry in 08.
Sure it can.maxtdi wrote:Um no excess capacity ? BruhDetroit wrote:
How many times do I have to post that the manufacturing situation is WAY different than in 2008? There is no excess capacity. No plants barely surviving. Every plant is at 100% max capacity right now. So, reducing volume doesn't really hurt as much as it did in 2008. Sure, people get laid off, but you're not spending billions shuttering wasted plants. THAT was the problem in 2008.
Yes, the finance game is there where the more you produce, the better you can amortize the cost of such production. But internal accounting (at least at GM) isn't set up entirely like that. Profit is determined on a per unit basis, labor, assembly, shipping, etc is determined based on production volume...which is now set by market size, not the volume required to keep a plant alive. These are two very different accounting methods...the latter being what tanked the industry in 08.
You're at record levels of auto sales why the fuck would you have excess capacity ... need I remind you sales dipped to 9-10 million from 17 where they are currently ?!
Now I don't think it'll be that bad but this industry can't deal with a 30-40 % contraction period
Desertbreh wrote: ↑Tue Oct 10, 2017 6:40 pm My guess would be that Chris took some time off because he has read the dialogue on this page 1,345 times and decided to spend some of his free time doing something besides beating a horse to death.