people in Philly are idiots over this celebration. One side of the city was looting, the other side was flipping cars. Lol
Desertbreh wrote: ↑Thu Oct 17, 2019 3:05 pm
DFD. The forum where everybody makes the same choices and then tells anybody trying to join the club that they are the stupidest motherfucker to ever walk the earth.
I like wiz on my cheesesteak. That said, my preference is Prov.
Desertbreh wrote: ↑Tue Oct 10, 2017 6:40 pm
My guess would be that Chris took some time off because he has read the dialogue on this page 1,345 times and decided to spend some of his free time doing something besides beating a horse to death.
Solid super bowl even though my team lost. Seems like these games come down to the weirdest and toughest calls to make as a ref. It's one of the reasons why I am turned off by football sometimes. Is it a catch? Running while catching yada yada. Can't you just say you caught the ball so it is a catch? haha
C00bs wrote: ↑Mon Feb 05, 2018 8:56 am
Solid super bowl even though my team lost. Seems like these games come down to the weirdest and toughest calls to make as a ref. It's one of the reasons why I am turned off by football sometimes. Is it a catch? Running while catching yada yada. Can't you just say you caught the ball so it is a catch? haha
The rule is terribly written and they interpreted it really well. I look forward to that one being fixed this year.
As a Pats fan, I hated seeing that "running man" catch, but it looked like a catch to me! The previous touchdown though seemed to me as if it should have not been one.
Anyone else think some of these big games are swayed on purpose with some calls? Just reminds me of the NBA series with the Lakers and Kings back in the day. I'm not saying 100% rigged or anything like this, but swayed for better storylines. I say this as a fan of some of the most hated teams who might have benefited.
As a Pats fan, I hated seeing that "running man" catch, but it looked like a catch to me! The previous touchdown though seemed to me as if it should have not been one.
Anyone else think some of these big games are swayed on purpose with some calls? Just reminds me of the NBA series with the Lakers and Kings back in the day. I'm not saying 100% rigged or anything like this, but swayed for better storylines. I say this as a fan of some of the most hated teams who might have benefited.
For years people said it was swayed in the Pats favor and Pats fans said "no way!" Now Pats fans are saying the opposite...
And no. I don't believe they are no or have been in recent memory.
I am not saying it wasn't swinged ever in the Pats favor or for the Eagles last night. I am admitting it might have been for some games! What about Kings v. Lakers? The ref went to jail for his sports bets, and he wrote a book about everything and his questionable calls. I am not saying this always happens, but it might!
Desertbreh wrote: ↑Thu Oct 17, 2019 3:05 pm
DFD. The forum where everybody makes the same choices and then tells anybody trying to join the club that they are the stupidest motherfucker to ever walk the earth.
KYGTIGuy wrote:Both would be clear TDs in the backyard after thanksgiving dinner.
Any other standard is unAmerican
Were they worth a second look? Sure! But I don’t think they were clearly not touchdowns like the announcers seemed to. They made them more controversial than they really were methinks.
KYGTIGuy wrote:Both would be clear TDs in the backyard after thanksgiving dinner.
Any other standard is unAmerican
Were they worth a second look? Sure! But I don’t think they were clearly not touchdowns like the announcers seemed to. They made them more controversial than they really were methinks.