That's the ridiculous market now...
:plac: finds v2.0: Moar gold on the crangslist
- ChrisoftheNorth
- Moderator
- Posts: 47112
- Joined: Thu Nov 03, 2016 6:10 am
- Drives: 4R
Desertbreh wrote: ↑Tue Oct 10, 2017 6:40 pm My guess would be that Chris took some time off because he has read the dialogue on this page 1,345 times and decided to spend some of his free time doing something besides beating a horse to death.
- coogles
- First Sirloin
- Posts: 5020
- Joined: Thu Nov 03, 2016 8:52 am
- Drives: Hooptie Crotchfruit Carrier
- Location: Indianapolis
I never tracked my MK6 either, but every bump made my car quiver and shake in ways I've never felt in any other car before or since, except the MK6R I test drove before I bought my MK7. But eh, my experience was clearly not everyone's.
- max225
- Chief Master Sirloin of the Wasteful Steak
- Posts: 42659
- Joined: Thu Nov 03, 2016 12:49 am
- Drives: Taco+ Bavarian lemon
Ooh so someone already blew the clutch on it … damn. Tuner lyfe.
- ChrisoftheNorth
- Moderator
- Posts: 47112
- Joined: Thu Nov 03, 2016 6:10 am
- Drives: 4R
Weird, My MK6 felt really solid, even after I moved it to Detroit and drove on the surface of the moon. My C5 felt like a wet noodle in comparison.
That car was kind of a freak though. It was Stage 1 Unitronic and never had a single issue, got good gas mileage, drove phenominal, etc.
Desertbreh wrote: ↑Tue Oct 10, 2017 6:40 pm My guess would be that Chris took some time off because he has read the dialogue on this page 1,345 times and decided to spend some of his free time doing something besides beating a horse to death.
- ChrisoftheNorth
- Moderator
- Posts: 47112
- Joined: Thu Nov 03, 2016 6:10 am
- Drives: 4R
Yea, it was tuned then the clutch was changed shortly after. The clutch was always the weak point on the MK6, especially when tuning on R's.
Whatever, the dude paid a fortune to have it done at a very reputable shop, so it wouldn't concern me much...only the drivability with a single mass flywheel is
Desertbreh wrote: ↑Tue Oct 10, 2017 6:40 pm My guess would be that Chris took some time off because he has read the dialogue on this page 1,345 times and decided to spend some of his free time doing something besides beating a horse to death.
- max225
- Chief Master Sirloin of the Wasteful Steak
- Posts: 42659
- Joined: Thu Nov 03, 2016 12:49 am
- Drives: Taco+ Bavarian lemon
Exactly … and it looks like a it’s for sale shortly after all that “money was dumped” into it … sus!Detroit wrote: ↑Thu Nov 18, 2021 11:36 amYea, it was tuned then the clutch was changed shortly after. The clutch was always the weak point on the MK6, especially when tuning on R's.
Whatever, the dude paid a fortune to have it done at a very reputable shop, so it wouldn't concern me much...only the drivability with a single mass flywheel is
- coogles
- First Sirloin
- Posts: 5020
- Joined: Thu Nov 03, 2016 8:52 am
- Drives: Hooptie Crotchfruit Carrier
- Location: Indianapolis
I had the total opposite experience, really. I bought mine new at the beginning of October before it really started to get cold, and by the middle of November I wanted out of that thing ASAP. And proceeded to drive it for another 6+ years of misery, hearing every panel and trim piece creak and groan over every bump and imperfection, door seals squeaking against the frame going up driveway curbs and the like. I mean...just awful.Detroit wrote: ↑Thu Nov 18, 2021 11:34 amWeird, My MK6 felt really solid, even after I moved it to Detroit and drove on the surface of the moon. My C5 felt like a wet noodle in comparison.
That car was kind of a freak though. It was Stage 1 Unitronic and never had a single issue, got good gas mileage, drove phenominal, etc.
- ChrisoftheNorth
- Moderator
- Posts: 47112
- Joined: Thu Nov 03, 2016 6:10 am
- Drives: 4R
"Baby on the way" breh.max225 wrote: ↑Thu Nov 18, 2021 11:38 amExactly … and it looks like a it’s for sale shortly after all that “money was dumped” into it … sus!Detroit wrote: ↑Thu Nov 18, 2021 11:36 am
Yea, it was tuned then the clutch was changed shortly after. The clutch was always the weak point on the MK6, especially when tuning on R's.
Whatever, the dude paid a fortune to have it done at a very reputable shop, so it wouldn't concern me much...only the drivability with a single mass flywheel is
But yea... Doesn't matter because it'll sell for WAY too much.
Desertbreh wrote: ↑Tue Oct 10, 2017 6:40 pm My guess would be that Chris took some time off because he has read the dialogue on this page 1,345 times and decided to spend some of his free time doing something besides beating a horse to death.
- ChrisoftheNorth
- Moderator
- Posts: 47112
- Joined: Thu Nov 03, 2016 6:10 am
- Drives: 4R
It's so weird, the production variation with MK6's seems to be all over the place. JP's was a POS too. Mine was fine, so was a number of others. Really a crap shoot, which makes the idea of paying big money for one even morecoogles wrote: ↑Thu Nov 18, 2021 11:40 amI had the total opposite experience, really. I bought mine new at the beginning of October before it really started to get cold, and by the middle of November I wanted out of that thing ASAP. And proceeded to drive it for another 6+ years of misery, hearing every panel and trim piece creak and groan over every bump and imperfection, door seals squeaking against the frame going up driveway curbs and the like. I mean...just awful.Detroit wrote: ↑Thu Nov 18, 2021 11:34 am
Weird, My MK6 felt really solid, even after I moved it to Detroit and drove on the surface of the moon. My C5 felt like a wet noodle in comparison.
That car was kind of a freak though. It was Stage 1 Unitronic and never had a single issue, got good gas mileage, drove phenominal, etc.
Desertbreh wrote: ↑Tue Oct 10, 2017 6:40 pm My guess would be that Chris took some time off because he has read the dialogue on this page 1,345 times and decided to spend some of his free time doing something besides beating a horse to death.
- wap
- Chief Master Sirloin of the Wasteful Steak
- Posts: 45228
- Joined: Wed Nov 02, 2016 11:52 pm
- Drives: Blue Meanie
- Location: Pepperland
Detroit wrote: ↑Thu Nov 18, 2021 11:43 amIt's so weird, the production variation with MK6's seems to be all over the place. JP's was a POS too. Mine was fine, so was a number of others. Really a crap shoot, which makes the idea of paying big money for one even morecoogles wrote: ↑Thu Nov 18, 2021 11:40 am
I had the total opposite experience, really. I bought mine new at the beginning of October before it really started to get cold, and by the middle of November I wanted out of that thing ASAP. And proceeded to drive it for another 6+ years of misery, hearing every panel and trim piece creak and groan over every bump and imperfection, door seals squeaking against the frame going up driveway curbs and the like. I mean...just awful.
Mine was pretty solid, too. It really only creaked inside while going over crumbling RR tracks in the winter. Once the weather warmed up it was much quieter over those same tracks. The MQB platform is more solid, and the Blue Meanie is just as quiet over those same tracks in winter as it is in summer.
- Tar
- Chief Master Sirloin
- Posts: 14133
- Joined: Fri Nov 04, 2016 6:06 pm
- Drives: Beige Family Sedan sans Dent
- Location: Canuckistan
The MK7 chassis is leaps and bounds better then the MK6, I never really had a problem with my MK6 TDIwap wrote: ↑Thu Nov 18, 2021 11:49 am
Mine was pretty solid, too. It really only creaked inside while going over crumbling RR tracks in the winter. Once the weather warmed up it was much quieter over those same tracks. The MQB platform is more solid, and the Blue Meanie is just as quiet over those same tracks in winter as it is in summer.
I think that the MK6R is a special car because they didn't come to North America in large numbers.
- max225
- Chief Master Sirloin of the Wasteful Steak
- Posts: 42659
- Joined: Thu Nov 03, 2016 12:49 am
- Drives: Taco+ Bavarian lemon
Wasn’t the mk6R the first one that wasn’t volume restricted at 5000. And it also spanned 2 model years … I flatbrim VW bros being super pissed off because “it’s no longer special”Tarspin wrote: ↑Thu Nov 18, 2021 11:55 amThe MK7 chassis is leaps and bounds better then the MK6, I never really had a problem with my MK6 TDIwap wrote: ↑Thu Nov 18, 2021 11:49 am
Mine was pretty solid, too. It really only creaked inside while going over crumbling RR tracks in the winter. Once the weather warmed up it was much quieter over those same tracks. The MQB platform is more solid, and the Blue Meanie is just as quiet over those same tracks in winter as it is in summer.
I think that the MK6R is a special car because they didn't come to North America in large numbers.
- ChrisoftheNorth
- Moderator
- Posts: 47112
- Joined: Thu Nov 03, 2016 6:10 am
- Drives: 4R
It volume capped itself because it was only and only 2 MYs, but yea...it wasn't really limited production like the IV or V was.
Desertbreh wrote: ↑Tue Oct 10, 2017 6:40 pm My guess would be that Chris took some time off because he has read the dialogue on this page 1,345 times and decided to spend some of his free time doing something besides beating a horse to death.
- ChrisoftheNorth
- Moderator
- Posts: 47112
- Joined: Thu Nov 03, 2016 6:10 am
- Drives: 4R
My MKV was a 2-door and I loved it. As a tall person, it's slightly easier to get in and out of, and the larger side window was really pleasant open. But 2-door = sports car is
Desertbreh wrote: ↑Tue Oct 10, 2017 6:40 pm My guess would be that Chris took some time off because he has read the dialogue on this page 1,345 times and decided to spend some of his free time doing something besides beating a horse to death.
- Tar
- Chief Master Sirloin
- Posts: 14133
- Joined: Fri Nov 04, 2016 6:06 pm
- Drives: Beige Family Sedan sans Dent
- Location: Canuckistan
I didn't have the exact deets on why they are limited in numbers, sounds like Chris has the right info.
- max225
- Chief Master Sirloin of the Wasteful Steak
- Posts: 42659
- Joined: Thu Nov 03, 2016 12:49 am
- Drives: Taco+ Bavarian lemon
Well it started with the mk iv VW tried to make it into a halo car i think it was still before they had the other opportunities to upsell people with other brands as they weren’t fully in their portfolio.
I think they actually went through considerable effort to make it into awd etc it was the most special R model IMO, and it has been diluted down every generation since.
Mk 4 unique BODY and Engine and drive system + brakes + unique interior + limited production/colors
Mk 5 unique drive system + major engine +modifications + brakes + rear mounted battery ! + limited production + colors
Mk 6 unique drive system + body kit + brakes + colors
Mk 7 unique drive system + engine modification. + colors
Mk 8 unique drive system + engine modification + colors
Every subsequent generation since the 4 narrowed the gap to the gti.
- Tar
- Chief Master Sirloin
- Posts: 14133
- Joined: Fri Nov 04, 2016 6:06 pm
- Drives: Beige Family Sedan sans Dent
- Location: Canuckistan
Hold the phones, mk5 still had the R32 vr6 motor, and then it went to FSI 2.0 4 cyl IIRC. That motor had a lot of issues that are mainly resolved on the MK7. It's a nice car, and pretty cool but I think the MK5 was more interesting with that wookie motor.max225 wrote: ↑Thu Nov 18, 2021 12:41 pmWell it started with the mk iv VW tried to make it into a halo car i think it was still before they had the other opportunities to upsell people with other brands as they weren’t fully in their portfolio.
I think they actually went through considerable effort to make it into awd etc it was the most special R model IMO, and it has been diluted down every generation since.
Mk 4 unique BODY and Engine and drive system + brakes + unique interior + limited production/colors
Mk 5 unique drive system + major engine +modifications + brakes + rear mounted battery ! + limited production + colors
Mk 6 unique drive system + body kit + brakes + colors
Mk 7 unique drive system + engine modification. + colors
Mk 8 unique drive system + engine modification + colors
Every subsequent generation since the 4 narrowed the gap to the gti.
- max225
- Chief Master Sirloin of the Wasteful Steak
- Posts: 42659
- Joined: Thu Nov 03, 2016 12:49 am
- Drives: Taco+ Bavarian lemon
Mk5 was VR6 yep, but that was no longer that unique … since it was around in other models and a carry over from the mk 4.Tarspin wrote: ↑Thu Nov 18, 2021 12:46 pmHold the phones, mk5 still had the R32 vr6 motor, and then it went to FSI 2.0 4 cyl IIRC. That motor had a lot of issues that are mainly resolved on the MK7. It's a nice car, and pretty cool but I think the MK5 was more interesting with that wookie motor.max225 wrote: ↑Thu Nov 18, 2021 12:41 pm
Well it started with the mk iv VW tried to make it into a halo car i think it was still before they had the other opportunities to upsell people with other brands as they weren’t fully in their portfolio.
I think they actually went through considerable effort to make it into awd etc it was the most special R model IMO, and it has been diluted down every generation since.
Mk 4 unique BODY and Engine and drive system + brakes + unique interior + limited production/colors
Mk 5 unique drive system + major engine +modifications + brakes + rear mounted battery ! + limited production + colors
Mk 6 unique drive system + body kit + brakes + colors
Mk 7 unique drive system + engine modification. + colors
Mk 8 unique drive system + engine modification + colors
Every subsequent generation since the 4 narrowed the gap to the gti.
Mk6 was a fairly modified FSI (from last gen gti) was timing belt + major carbon issues + that direct injection pump issue where the plunger cup would have to be changed on the pump and eventually wear out the cam
Mk7 was tfsi that’s essentially almost same as regular gti (in the us versions)
- Desertbreh
- Chief Master Sirloin
- Posts: 16951
- Joined: Thu Nov 03, 2016 11:31 am
- Location: Beyond Thunderdome
- ChrisoftheNorth
- Moderator
- Posts: 47112
- Joined: Thu Nov 03, 2016 6:10 am
- Drives: 4R
I thought the MK6 R was a TSI engine so timing chain? Carboner issues still a problemmax225 wrote: ↑Thu Nov 18, 2021 12:51 pmMk5 was VR6 yep, but that was no longer that unique … since it was around in other models and a carry over from the mk 4.
Mk6 was a fairly modified FSI (from last gen gti) was timing belt + major carbon issues + that direct injection pump issue where the plunger cup would have to be changed on the pump and eventually wear out the cam
Mk7 was tfsi that’s essentially almost same as regular gti (in the us versions)
Desertbreh wrote: ↑Tue Oct 10, 2017 6:40 pm My guess would be that Chris took some time off because he has read the dialogue on this page 1,345 times and decided to spend some of his free time doing something besides beating a horse to death.
- max225
- Chief Master Sirloin of the Wasteful Steak
- Posts: 42659
- Joined: Thu Nov 03, 2016 12:49 am
- Drives: Taco+ Bavarian lemon
No it wasn’t, last gen FSI from mk5 but relatively modified. Which is why a modded FSI/r made less power than a modded tsiDetroit wrote: ↑Thu Nov 18, 2021 1:06 pmI thought the MK6 R was a TSI engine so timing chain? Carboner issues still a problemmax225 wrote: ↑Thu Nov 18, 2021 12:51 pm
Mk5 was VR6 yep, but that was no longer that unique … since it was around in other models and a carry over from the mk 4.
Mk6 was a fairly modified FSI (from last gen gti) was timing belt + major carbon issues + that direct injection pump issue where the plunger cup would have to be changed on the pump and eventually wear out the cam
Mk7 was tfsi that’s essentially almost same as regular gti (in the us versions)
- ChrisoftheNorth
- Moderator
- Posts: 47112
- Joined: Thu Nov 03, 2016 6:10 am
- Drives: 4R
Desertbreh wrote: ↑Tue Oct 10, 2017 6:40 pm My guess would be that Chris took some time off because he has read the dialogue on this page 1,345 times and decided to spend some of his free time doing something besides beating a horse to death.
I had Uni stage 1 as well and it was flawless. It certainly did not make the C5 feel like a wet noodleDetroit wrote: ↑Thu Nov 18, 2021 11:34 amWeird, My MK6 felt really solid, even after I moved it to Detroit and drove on the surface of the moon. My C5 felt like a wet noodle in comparison.
That car was kind of a freak though. It was Stage 1 Unitronic and never had a single issue, got good gas mileage, drove phenominal, etc.
I think if I drove a now I would not like it that much, but as my first 'fast car' after years in a 100 hp Civic, it was pretty sweet.
- coogles
- First Sirloin
- Posts: 5020
- Joined: Thu Nov 03, 2016 8:52 am
- Drives: Hooptie Crotchfruit Carrier
- Location: Indianapolis
Add the HPFP and the MK6R was ~equal to a TSI on the K04.
MK6R
K04 GTI
Plus the Gen 1 TSI actually ended up having way more problems than the FSIs did in the way that it's the problems you know vs the ones you don't. Yes, you have to change the cam follower every so often and it needs a timing belt at 90k or whatever, but otherwise they don't have nearly the problems with the other stuff bolted to the engine as the Gen 1 TSI does.