Does nothing for me… I do prefer the new gen ugly and all.Desertbreh wrote: ↑Tue Jun 22, 2021 11:52 amIt is BEEG. I think its a good truck though. A guy at the gym has one with sweet ramz in that Cavalry Blue with a number of TRD bits on it and it looks pretty butch.
Mine certainly does. There's a guy who parks his Ferrari in the handicapped space out front.max225 wrote: ↑Tue Jun 22, 2021 12:37 pmDoes nothing for me… I do prefer the new gen ugly and all.Desertbreh wrote: ↑Tue Jun 22, 2021 11:52 am
It is BEEG. I think its a good truck though. A guy at the gym has one with sweet ramz in that Cavalry Blue with a number of TRD bits on it and it looks pretty butch.
We should Have a gym car/truk Thread. It seems like that establishment draws an interesting crowd
WOW[user not found] wrote: ↑Tue Jun 22, 2021 4:16 pm https://cnj.craigslist.org/cto/d/helmet ... 58959.html
That price is straight bonkers.
That belongs in a junkyard[user not found] wrote: ↑Tue Jun 22, 2021 4:16 pm https://cnj.craigslist.org/cto/d/helmet ... 58959.html
That price is straight bonkers.
WOW.[user not found] wrote: ↑Tue Jun 22, 2021 4:16 pm https://cnj.craigslist.org/cto/d/helmet ... 58959.html
That price is straight bonkers.
D Griff wrote: ↑Tue Jun 22, 2021 5:23 pmWOW.[user not found] wrote: ↑Tue Jun 22, 2021 4:16 pm https://cnj.craigslist.org/cto/d/helmet ... 58959.html
That price is straight bonkers.
200K+ miles: check
Worst color imaginable: check
Totaled levels of rust: check
Price of a new Maverick: almost check
Desertbreh wrote: ↑Tue Oct 10, 2017 6:40 pm My guess would be that Chris took some time off because he has read the dialogue on this page 1,345 times and decided to spend some of his free time doing something besides beating a horse to death.
Man that's a base PW too. Probably was $50k after cash on the hood for the original buyer.Devilchrono wrote: ↑Mon Aug 02, 2021 8:48 pm I have absolutely no need for this thing, but the want is strong for some reason:
https://www.baldwinautomotivegroup.com/ ... 42ed16.htm
That new little trucklet from H , the Santa Cruz. is it's closest competitor, no? MSRP for that is like $24k. Just based on how H/K are killing it these days, I'd probably opt for one of those. Although, I'm not in themax225 wrote: ↑Fri Oct 08, 2021 3:30 pm Also to bring up an interesting topic here.
The ford Maverick seems to be a bit of game changer... while it has a fairly small bed at only 4.5" it is in fact quite usable as a "city" truck. Most don't need 4wd and FWD is preferable to RWD in almost all application when it comes to a "truck". That said the MPGs are impressive for that tiny Hybrid and you're no longer required to get an archaic powertrain elsewhere that gets 20mpg... and you can essentially get close to 40!!
It has a quirky and decent interior and its quite practical... The pricing is EPIC at 20k and 25-27 for a pretty loaded FWD model.
now all of the advantages fall apart when you opt for AWD+ the 2.0T which makes it completely useless IMO as it brings it over 30k. But the base FWD model is GREAT!
What do ya'll think.
market so 
what I think. 
after living with one of their products for 2 years now. 
for what it is.
If that little bastard could tow 5k lbs, I'd probably buy one. Ford really nailed it with that thing IMO.max225 wrote: ↑Fri Oct 08, 2021 3:30 pm Also to bring up an interesting topic here.
The ford Maverick seems to be a bit of game changer... while it has a fairly small bed at only 4.5" it is in fact quite usable as a "city" truck. Most don't need 4wd and FWD is preferable to RWD in almost all application when it comes to a "truck". That said the MPGs are impressive for that tiny Hybrid and you're no longer required to get an archaic powertrain elsewhere that gets 20mpg... and you can essentially get close to 40!!
It has a quirky and decent interior and its quite practical... The pricing is EPIC at 20k and 25-27 for a pretty loaded FWD model.
now all of the advantages fall apart when you opt for AWD+ the 2.0T which makes it completely useless IMO as it brings it over 30k. But the base FWD model is GREAT!
What do ya'll think.
Desertbreh wrote: ↑Tue Oct 10, 2017 6:40 pm My guess would be that Chris took some time off because he has read the dialogue on this page 1,345 times and decided to spend some of his free time doing something besides beating a horse to death.
I'd be really curious to drive one of these, but I think I prefer the Maverick because it's more utilitarian than trying to bewap wrote: ↑Fri Oct 08, 2021 3:59 pmThat new little trucklet from H , the Santa Cruz. is it's closest competitor, no? MSRP for that is like $24k. Just based on how H/K are killing it these days, I'd probably opt for one of those. Although, I'm not in themax225 wrote: ↑Fri Oct 08, 2021 3:30 pm Also to bring up an interesting topic here.
The ford Maverick seems to be a bit of game changer... while it has a fairly small bed at only 4.5" it is in fact quite usable as a "city" truck. Most don't need 4wd and FWD is preferable to RWD in almost all application when it comes to a "truck". That said the MPGs are impressive for that tiny Hybrid and you're no longer required to get an archaic powertrain elsewhere that gets 20mpg... and you can essentially get close to 40!!
It has a quirky and decent interior and its quite practical... The pricing is EPIC at 20k and 25-27 for a pretty loaded FWD model.
now all of the advantages fall apart when you opt for AWD+ the 2.0T which makes it completely useless IMO as it brings it over 30k. But the base FWD model is GREAT!
What do ya'll think.
MSRP: From $23,990
Towing capacity: 3,500 to 5,000 lbs
MPG: Up to 21 city / 27 highway
Dimensions: 196″ L x 75″ W x 67″ H
Bed length: 48″
Horsepower: 191 to 277 hp
Though IF I were, I'd probably go with the Santa Cruz as I've totally drunk the
Also looks kind of
Desertbreh wrote: ↑Tue Oct 10, 2017 6:40 pm My guess would be that Chris took some time off because he has read the dialogue on this page 1,345 times and decided to spend some of his free time doing something besides beating a horse to death.
Um,Detroit wrote: ↑Fri Oct 08, 2021 4:02 pmIf that little bastard could tow 5k lbs, I'd probably buy one. Ford really nailed it with that thing IMO.max225 wrote: ↑Fri Oct 08, 2021 3:30 pm Also to bring up an interesting topic here.
The ford Maverick seems to be a bit of game changer... while it has a fairly small bed at only 4.5" it is in fact quite usable as a "city" truck. Most don't need 4wd and FWD is preferable to RWD in almost all application when it comes to a "truck". That said the MPGs are impressive for that tiny Hybrid and you're no longer required to get an archaic powertrain elsewhere that gets 20mpg... and you can essentially get close to 40!!
It has a quirky and decent interior and its quite practical... The pricing is EPIC at 20k and 25-27 for a pretty loaded FWD model.
now all of the advantages fall apart when you opt for AWD+ the 2.0T which makes it completely useless IMO as it brings it over 30k. But the base FWD model is GREAT!
What do ya'll think.
Yea it tops out at 4K in the top awd 2.0T trim. Which is pricy and no longer fuel efficient. Frankly I don’t think it was designed to tow.Detroit wrote: ↑Fri Oct 08, 2021 4:02 pmIf that little bastard could tow 5k lbs, I'd probably buy one. Ford really nailed it with that thing IMO.max225 wrote: ↑Fri Oct 08, 2021 3:30 pm Also to bring up an interesting topic here.
The ford Maverick seems to be a bit of game changer... while it has a fairly small bed at only 4.5" it is in fact quite usable as a "city" truck. Most don't need 4wd and FWD is preferable to RWD in almost all application when it comes to a "truck". That said the MPGs are impressive for that tiny Hybrid and you're no longer required to get an archaic powertrain elsewhere that gets 20mpg... and you can essentially get close to 40!!
It has a quirky and decent interior and its quite practical... The pricing is EPIC at 20k and 25-27 for a pretty loaded FWD model.
now all of the advantages fall apart when you opt for AWD+ the 2.0T which makes it completely useless IMO as it brings it over 30k. But the base FWD model is GREAT!
What do ya'll think.
There are two major things setting the two apart. The Ford is 20/30% cheaper and 40-50% more fuel efficient in the base trim. I think it makes for a perfect little “contractor” “bakery” trucklet type thing although a van is probably superior but if you want a smol bed you can’t really go wrongwap wrote: ↑Fri Oct 08, 2021 3:59 pmThat new little trucklet from H , the Santa Cruz. is it's closest competitor, no? MSRP for that is like $24k. Just based on how H/K are killing it these days, I'd probably opt for one of those. Although, I'm not in themax225 wrote: ↑Fri Oct 08, 2021 3:30 pm Also to bring up an interesting topic here.
The ford Maverick seems to be a bit of game changer... while it has a fairly small bed at only 4.5" it is in fact quite usable as a "city" truck. Most don't need 4wd and FWD is preferable to RWD in almost all application when it comes to a "truck". That said the MPGs are impressive for that tiny Hybrid and you're no longer required to get an archaic powertrain elsewhere that gets 20mpg... and you can essentially get close to 40!!
It has a quirky and decent interior and its quite practical... The pricing is EPIC at 20k and 25-27 for a pretty loaded FWD model.
now all of the advantages fall apart when you opt for AWD+ the 2.0T which makes it completely useless IMO as it brings it over 30k. But the base FWD model is GREAT!
What do ya'll think.
MSRP: From $23,990
Towing capacity: 3,500 to 5,000 lbs
MPG: Up to 21 city / 27 highway
Dimensions: 196″ L x 75″ W x 67″ H
Bed length: 48″
Horsepower: 191 to 277 hp
Though IF I were, I'd probably go with the Santa Cruz as I've totally drunk the
Also looks kind of
No, it clearly wasn't and that's fine for that it is. It's what the Ranger is for and it's how Ford is differentiating between the two.
in 2 years. Desertbreh wrote: ↑Tue Oct 10, 2017 6:40 pm My guess would be that Chris took some time off because he has read the dialogue on this page 1,345 times and decided to spend some of his free time doing something besides beating a horse to death.
Desertbreh wrote: ↑Tue Oct 10, 2017 6:40 pm My guess would be that Chris took some time off because he has read the dialogue on this page 1,345 times and decided to spend some of his free time doing something besides beating a horse to death.
I’m very curious about the taco. Rumors say toyota will switch everything to the new tundra platform which is frigging epic !Detroit wrote: ↑Fri Oct 08, 2021 4:09 pmNo, it clearly wasn't and that's fine for that it is. It's what the Ranger is for and it's how Ford is differentiating between the two.
I'm really curious about the new Ranger. The midsize truck segment is going to be
All-new:
Tacoma
Colorado/Canyon
Ranger
One of them will be my next vehicle.
2022 Ford Maverickmax225 wrote: ↑Fri Oct 08, 2021 4:09 pmThere are two major things setting the two apart. The Ford is 20/30% cheaper and 40-50% more fuel efficient in the base trim. I think it makes for a perfect little “contractor” “bakery” trucklet type thing although a van is probably superior but if you want a smol bed you can’t really go wrongwap wrote: ↑Fri Oct 08, 2021 3:59 pm
That new little trucklet from H , the Santa Cruz. is it's closest competitor, no? MSRP for that is like $24k. Just based on how H/K are killing it these days, I'd probably opt for one of those. Although, I'm not in the
MSRP: From $23,990
Towing capacity: 3,500 to 5,000 lbs
MPG: Up to 21 city / 27 highway
Dimensions: 196″ L x 75″ W x 67″ H
Bed length: 48″
Horsepower: 191 to 277 hp
Though IF I were, I'd probably go with the Santa Cruz as I've totally drunk the
Also looks kind of
Yea, the GM 3.6 is proving to be a not great engine. Timing chain issues are popping up in older units, combine that with tq converter issues when paired with the RWD 8 speed, and man...I think steering clear is the way. But the new truck will get the 2.7T and 10 speed from the Silverado, which would be epic in that truck. So I'm not ruling it out.max225 wrote: ↑Fri Oct 08, 2021 4:16 pmI’m very curious about the taco. Rumors say toyota will switch everything to the new tundra platform which is frigging epic !Detroit wrote: ↑Fri Oct 08, 2021 4:09 pm
No, it clearly wasn't and that's fine for that it is. It's what the Ranger is for and it's how Ford is differentiating between the two.
I'm really curious about the new Ranger. The midsize truck segment is going to be
All-new:
Tacoma
Colorado/Canyon
Ranger
One of them will be my next vehicle.
And other than being too big would be my next vehicle. 22 tundra fixed everything wrong with the 07 model that they sold through 21
I don’t think I’m holding my breath on gm there have been weird issues with their products, fked torque converters and those valve train issues on the v6 right ?
Yoda forums say the taco won’t get here till 26 but other publications say 24 … who knows with “cOvid” delays
Desertbreh wrote: ↑Tue Oct 10, 2017 6:40 pm My guess would be that Chris took some time off because he has read the dialogue on this page 1,345 times and decided to spend some of his free time doing something besides beating a horse to death.
The 2.0T is same the 2.5 hybrid is 40/30wap wrote: ↑Fri Oct 08, 2021 4:21 pm2022 Ford Maverickmax225 wrote: ↑Fri Oct 08, 2021 4:09 pm
There are two major things setting the two apart. The Ford is 20/30% cheaper and 40-50% more fuel efficient in the base trim. I think it makes for a perfect little “contractor” “bakery” trucklet type thing although a van is probably superior but if you want a smol bed you can’t really go wrong
Pickup truck
MPG: Up to 23 city / 30 highway
MSRP: From $19,995
Towing capacity: 2,000 lbs
Dimensions: 200″ L x 73″ W x 69″ H
Bed length: 54″
Engine: 2.0 L 4-cylinder, 2.5 L 4-cylinder
Mileage doesn't seem to be that different.
Hybrid 2.5L is supposed to get 40mph highway.wap wrote: ↑Fri Oct 08, 2021 4:21 pm2022 Ford Maverickmax225 wrote: ↑Fri Oct 08, 2021 4:09 pm
There are two major things setting the two apart. The Ford is 20/30% cheaper and 40-50% more fuel efficient in the base trim. I think it makes for a perfect little “contractor” “bakery” trucklet type thing although a van is probably superior but if you want a smol bed you can’t really go wrong
Pickup truck
MPG: Up to 23 city / 30 highway
MSRP: From $19,995
Towing capacity: 2,000 lbs
Dimensions: 200″ L x 73″ W x 69″ H
Bed length: 54″
Engine: 2.0 L 4-cylinder, 2.5 L 4-cylinder
Mileage doesn't seem to be that different.
Desertbreh wrote: ↑Tue Oct 10, 2017 6:40 pm My guess would be that Chris took some time off because he has read the dialogue on this page 1,345 times and decided to spend some of his free time doing something besides beating a horse to death.
